Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Malcolm
Bob Taft has been somewhat of a disaster. Not too popular among the faithful here. I have doubts that he'd do well nationally.

Jeb Bush? Seems like a good man. But I'm worried there may be a sense among the electorate of "Bush fatigue". With the exception of the '96 debacle, that name has been on the national ballot going back to 1980. True, we've won the majority of those contests, but I'm wondering if the 'Rats might not make some issue out of the "it's time for a change" notion? We can pre-empt that by getting a good, new, fresh face in there.

49 posted on 12/09/2004 8:27:06 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: chimera

True. Plus, Jeb doesn't want to run.


56 posted on 12/09/2004 8:31:01 AM PST by RockinRight (Liberals are OK with racism and sexism, as long as it is aimed at a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: chimera

Yeah, Taft and Voinovich are about as interesting as cold oatmeal. They are as drab is Kucinich is loony.


232 posted on 12/09/2004 3:47:57 PM PST by Right Wing Assault (Wish me a Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson