I am fully aware of the pro-life plank; unfortunately, that's not your only agenda; no candidate with your strident views will ever get the nomination again; Bush 43 has taken the party as far to the right as it can go.
Good.
...unfortunately, that's not your only agenda;
Too bad you consider the fact that I care about the broad range of conservative issues to be 'unfortunate'. Which of those issues do you disagree with me on? Fundamental tax reform? Judicial reform? Religious liberty? School choice? Protection of the right to keep and bear arms? A strong national defense? A strong American foreign policy? What????
...no candidate with your strident views will ever get the nomination again;
And exactly which views might that be? And how are they 'strident'? I think my views are simply Christian and conservative and Republican.
Bush 43 has taken the party as far to the right as it can go.
That's hardly the case. We could easily have a Republican nominee who would be willing to wield a veto pen on excessive spending, for example.
Or who would not endorse so-called 'civil unions', thereby undermining the whole fight to protect traditional marriage.