And what lesson would that be? That the Judiciary are to be regarded as unopposed dictators? That the will of the majority can be wiped out at a stroke of the pen, and we should roll over and take it? That the Federal government can both refuse to do their Constitutional duty to protect the borders and simultaneously deny the States and the People the means to pick up their slack?
What I'd truly love to see is the AG of some border state sue the Feds for the costs incurred because they haven't controlled the borders. It seems there is actionable cause under Article IV, section 4, under which the Feds are required to "protect each of them [States] against Invasion."
The lesson? That it is absolutely insane to continue to do the same thing over and over again and expect a different result. Why don't you try to funnel your hate for these immigrants by trying to elect some people to congress that actually support your agenda? The federal government supremacy in matters of immigration is well well settled law, yet the hooligans on your side throw a tantrum every time a federal judge boots one of your silly amendments out the door.