[Chemist_Geek]

"The plaintiff argues that your client created a foreseeable zone of risk," Gross said to Valor attorney Tom Warner. "Then why isn't a duty created?"

Because the plaintiff's argument is false! Valor created no forseeable zone of risk by manufacturing and selling firearms wholesale in accordance with State and Federal laws. Were Valor to be held liable, the courts would be filled the next day with suits against Ford, GM, Toyota, DaimlerChrysler, etc., for creating risk by manufacturing and selling automobiles.

As usual, this is an attempt to get to deep pockets, as well as a politically motivated attempt to bankrupt and run out of business a firearms manufacturer.

[armyavonlady]

My hope is that mucho money is spent by plaintiff's counsel, that they lose big time and have to pay the defendants' legal fees and costs. This one is much worse than the suit against Bushmaster.