To: Tumbleweed_Connection
But it did popularize the idea of a "personal" computer for the mass market with the 1981 introduction of a desktop machine featuring a more user-friendly operating system,
Wrong. DOS 1.0 was not significantly "friendlier" than CPM 2.2 or Apple II's OS. IBM's significance was that their getting into the business legitimized in a way that Commodore, Apple, Exidy, Osborne and others couldn't. The deal saddens me. I am the MIS manager for my company, and I avoid buying Red Chinese equipment as well as I can. First, Carly Fiorina chases the engineers out of a company that had the best of them (HP). Now, IBM, whose workstations, servers and notebooks were solid (e.g. Intellistation) even if their Acer-made desktops weren't has sold the whole business to a company owned by the Communist Chinese government! If this keeps up, I am going to wind up buying Intel brand motherboards and assemble the user's computers and company servers myself!
34 posted on
12/07/2004 7:17:54 PM PST by
sittnick
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: sittnick
First, Carly Fiorina chases the engineers out of a company that had the best of them (HP). Now, IBM, whose workstations, servers and notebooks were solid (e.g. Intellistation
Whats going on over at HP? I thought they were in good shape.
135 posted on
12/09/2004 6:39:28 AM PST by
ghitma
(MeClaudius)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson