Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/07/2004 5:26:32 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 26lemoncharlie

,,, Rowan should forget about religious jokes for a while - it's high time he saw the opportunity staring him in the face... it's clear the biggest joke of all is government.


2 posted on 12/07/2004 5:30:21 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 26lemoncharlie
a new law targeting "incitement to religious hatred" will not curtail free speech. He said the measure "will not criminalise material just because it stirs up ridicule, prejudice, dislike, contempt or anger".

What an utterly unworkable standard! People should just remember the old adage, "sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never harm me." Our First Amendment jurisprudence with its "clear and present danger" standard is much better and more protective of free speech.

3 posted on 12/07/2004 5:30:55 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 26lemoncharlie
He said he had sympathy with the law's backers, particular British Muslims, but added: "I appreciate this measure is an attempt to provide comfort and protection to them.

The muslims are probably being a lot kinder to the comedians than they realize. Remember that Salman Rushdie had a bounty put on his head by muslims when he blasphemed Allah (or was it Mohammed?).

The muslims just want to force comedians to hold their tongue (least it be cut out entirely).

Shaira Law anyone?

4 posted on 12/07/2004 5:35:48 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 26lemoncharlie
Rowan Atkinson rocks.


5 posted on 12/07/2004 5:40:13 PM PST by Sloth (Al Franken is a racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 26lemoncharlie

When your rights are endowed by men, then men can take them away. Twits!


6 posted on 12/07/2004 5:53:32 PM PST by Stars N Stripes (When a 20 footer sneaks up like a ton a lead, an the crest comes along and slaps um up side the head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 26lemoncharlie
"He said the measure "will not criminalise material just because it stirs up ridicule, prejudice, dislike, contempt or anger".

Sure, that's what he means but how would it play out in practice? Didn't that Swedish pastor spend time in jail for preaching the bible? Wasn't there a case in Canada that was similar?

I guess what they really mean is that they won't prosecute people who ridicule Christianity (which is fair game, in my opinion) but they will prosecute Christians who ridicule other religions.

7 posted on 12/07/2004 5:55:36 PM PST by Gingersnap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 26lemoncharlie
If a free society begins to legislate people into politeness, it is no longer a free society. I would not want to criminalize satire based on religion, race, sex, or anything else.

And Atkinson is missing a fortune if he doesn't start making fun of Zapatero immediately.

8 posted on 12/07/2004 6:22:25 PM PST by atomicpossum (I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson