Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New Red-Diaper Babies
New York Times ^ | December 7, 2004 | David Brooks

Posted on 12/07/2004 3:51:25 PM PST by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: DC native

My BIL was 34 when he got married....his youngest is number 7.


41 posted on 12/07/2004 5:02:24 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Could be me! But my reply to David Brooks is:

What's it to you?

Why would a 'real' man worry about others' business so much?

42 posted on 12/07/2004 5:14:40 PM PST by xtinct (I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highflight

Here, here. It is a disgusting shame that our traditional American values have become part of the fringe because of those you listed.
Time to take back the country.


43 posted on 12/07/2004 5:14:49 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (I'm fresh out of tags. I'll pick some up tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DC native

--- I wonder if the writer can back up the claim that "natalists" (read: crazed baby maachines) tend to marry earlier. ---

I believe that should read "earlier than all the myopic NY Times writers that haven't seen or spoken to a red stater in the past 30+ years".

The only thing these morons know about red states is that the cars look like little ants from 30,000 feet up.


44 posted on 12/07/2004 5:15:15 PM PST by lews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
As far as I know, the color blue is associated with conservatives in virtually every country in the Western world save the U.S.
I've been told that the American use of blue to denote the Democrats only dates to the mid-1970's when the major TV networks reversed the traditional associations so as not to have their liberal friends painted (rightly IMHO) with the communist brush.

One assumes that it's no accident that the "Bonnie Blue Flag", besides by Virginia's, has long stood for individual states' rights as guaranteed by strict interpretation of The U. S. Constitution.

Personally, I consider myself a "true blue" conservative.
45 posted on 12/07/2004 5:17:57 PM PST by GMMAC (lots of terror cells in Canada - I'll be waving my US flag when the Marines arrive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

You are absolutely correct......raising a child is not for the narcissistic.

Tom Tancredo, one of the greatest guys in the House of Reps represents Douglas County, CO......wonder if he has anything to do with creating an environment conducive to child rearing.

Conservative base flock to him, or did the conservative base just elect one who shares their values? Interesting Chicken / Egg conundrum.


46 posted on 12/07/2004 5:21:23 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Veritas vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ReadyNow

They eat their young.


47 posted on 12/07/2004 5:25:07 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

And I think Brooks is very wrong, wishfully wrong about thinking families with multiple chidren aren't active in the culture war...they are often on the cutting edge because they have a lot at stake...


48 posted on 12/07/2004 5:26:26 PM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

No, they abort them.


49 posted on 12/07/2004 5:29:44 PM PST by Gaetano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

THAT is a BEAUTIFUL BABY!!! : )


50 posted on 12/07/2004 5:40:25 PM PST by Politicalmom ( Since Bush was selected in 2000, shouldn't he be able to run again in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MaineRepublic
Where is the picture of the colicky infant at 2:00 AM? ;)

Seared ... SEARED into my memory ... but unfortunately we don't have the brain-wave-digital-transfer thingie for the pictures yet :-).

51 posted on 12/07/2004 5:54:00 PM PST by Tax-chick (Benedicere cor tuo! Quomodo cogis comas tuas sic videri?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Thanks!


52 posted on 12/07/2004 5:54:29 PM PST by Tax-chick (Benedicere cor tuo! Quomodo cogis comas tuas sic videri?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MaineRepublic
"I'd go for 3 or 4 kids if it wasn't so much work. Hats off to those who can handle this many kids without breaking anything against a wall, you have the gift of patience."

I had four. As a rule, by the time the last one arrives, the oldest one is big enough to help out a little. They also help teach and discipline the younger siblings. It doesn't cost any more for a 10-pound bag of potatoes for a family of six or eight than it does for a 10-pound bag of potatoes for a family of three or four, even though it may have to purchased a little more often. Clothes often get handed down, as do toys, bedrooms, etc. The important things in life are often more easily understood in larger families. I am right in the middle of seven, my husband was next-youngest of eight. His parents came from equally large families. My father had nine siblings. Out of all of it, nobody starved, and all got at least an eighth-grade education. Big families are practical and warm, generally.

53 posted on 12/07/2004 6:05:06 PM PST by redhead ("Gee, Ricky. I'm sorry your mom blew up...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MaineRepublic

I gave birth to 5. I wanted 9, but saw there was no way we could have afforded more. It's one of the few regrets I have in this life...I didn't get to have my 9 kids.


54 posted on 12/07/2004 6:09:15 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ReadyNow
I lamented to a married-but-childless friend that I would never have the investment portfolio that so many others our age do.

He replied, "But you invested all of your money in your 3 kids - and it was a much better investment than any I've made."

55 posted on 12/07/2004 6:12:22 PM PST by 1stMarylandRegiment (Conserve Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I have a little friend for him :)
56 posted on 12/07/2004 6:12:51 PM PST by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MaineRepublic

My first had colic 6 months straight, twenty hours a day, violently threw-up every solid we gave him his first year, and several times managed to hit objects a good ten feet away whilst getting his diaper changed. #2 no less- I took to wearing a smock and always standing to the side while performing the deed.

My second is an angelbaby and has never given a moments trouble, as I knew she would be from the moment I found out she was coming.

I mean, the Good Lord wouldn't do that to a godfearing woman more than once, now, would he LOL

:)


57 posted on 12/07/2004 6:26:47 PM PST by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: angcat
Well, I have to get on the bandwagon, too. (We were at the zoo, at it was BROILING out, so they are a bit disheveled. : )
58 posted on 12/07/2004 6:35:53 PM PST by Politicalmom ( Since Bush was selected in 2000, shouldn't he be able to run again in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Oops. Sorry that is so big.


59 posted on 12/07/2004 6:36:17 PM PST by Politicalmom ( Since Bush was selected in 2000, shouldn't he be able to run again in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

My grandmother was one of 13 sisters. There was one boy born, but he died after about a month. Some said he couldn't stand it.


60 posted on 12/07/2004 6:46:19 PM PST by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson