Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dead
Kissling suggests instead trying to change the legislation to say that fetal anesthesia should be respectfully offered as an option.

Actually, it should be required by state law, for abortions at a stage where the fetus is capable of feeling pain. State laws do not allow inhumane methods of euthanizing unwanted or sick animals.

23 posted on 12/07/2004 1:42:47 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
anesthesia should be respectfully offered as an option

Definition 1: A drug, administered for medical or surgical purposes, that induces partial or total loss of sensation and may be topical, local, regional, or general, depending on the method of administration and area of the body affected.

If anesthesia is being administrated to a body explain to me how they can justify the fetus as a non-entity or mass of cells. If you have a body can you not prove murder. It is a mainstay of a prosecuters case in a homicide.

Definition 2 : loss of sensation and usually of consciousness without loss of vital functions artificially produced by the administration of one or more agents that block the passage of pain impulses along nerve pathways to the brain.

Same argument, if the anesthesia is being administered to an entity with a brain their whole Pro Choice argument should be thrown out with yesterday's bath water.

Any lawyers in the crowd?

50 posted on 12/07/2004 7:52:49 PM PST by Allosaurs_r_us (Idaho Carnivores for Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson