To: mysterio
I object to fingerprinting people before they are convicted. Safety statists sold that freedom long ago. So how do you presume to prosecute crimes that have no witnesses? Like burglaries or murders? You know...cases where the fingerprints are the key evidence linking the criminal to the crime?
Well, Einstein...I'm waiting.
24 posted on
12/07/2004 1:31:40 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
To: Prime Choice
Let's just cut to the quick and fingerprint, retinal scan, and get a DNA swab of EVERYONE when they are born or apply for marriage licenses, immigration, etc. < /sarcasm >
51 posted on
12/07/2004 2:30:24 PM PST by
weegee
(WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson