Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MississippiMan
Of course, this is common sense; without parasitically siphoning from heterosexuals, homosexuals would become extinct within ONE generation.

Not necesarily. If there is a gay gene, it could well be recessive. That would explain why one child in a family ends up gay while the others are straight.

79 posted on 12/07/2004 7:40:39 AM PST by Modernman (Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Modernman
If there is a gay gene, it could well be recessive.

Then we should do our best to keep it recessed.

But I think the Jury is pretty well in on that one. All the best efforts of the best homosexual researchers have failed to produce any evidence of a gay gene.

There could, perhaps, be a gay tendency, as with alcohol, but nothing that the person could not control with the proper training.

Shalom.

130 posted on 12/07/2004 8:24:16 AM PST by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson