Nobody ever said Scott had good taste in "tail," did they? That being said, she proved truthful -- and has evidence to back up her story.
Who is going to cash in on this, big time.
I hope you remember that remark when the Petersons write THEIR book.
If the Petersons write a book, atleast they waited until after the trial. She started during the trial which proves she had a financial motive in the case. Bet my life, if this case "Is" successfully appealed, her testimony will NOT be allowed in the next trial...