Yes it is. Tell me how if it is found that a person could potentially gain financially, how could it not be?
If it can be proven that Amber was in the position to possibly make thousands--then her testimony will be in question. If thats the case--then the Defense has the argument that she had a MOTIVE.
With every post, you prove how clueless you are about this case and the law.
She has an attorney; Allred, whatever you think of her, isn't going to let anything her client does jeopardize this case.
Oh, dear. You say "in question" as if all one must do is pose a question, never mind "the answer", as in Amber's testimony was verified; it didn't rest on her say-so.
Next faulty point, please.