Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

Yes it is. Tell me how if it is found that a person could potentially gain financially, how could it not be?
If it can be proven that Amber was in the position to possibly make thousands--then her testimony will be in question. If thats the case--then the Defense has the argument that she had a MOTIVE.


251 posted on 12/07/2004 9:43:23 AM PST by theconservativerepublican (www.theconservativerepublican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: theconservativerepublican
Tell me how if it is found that a person could potentially gain financially, how could it not be?

With every post, you prove how clueless you are about this case and the law.

She has an attorney; Allred, whatever you think of her, isn't going to let anything her client does jeopardize this case.

333 posted on 12/07/2004 11:23:56 AM PST by Howlin (W, Still the President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: theconservativerepublican
If it can be proven that Amber was in the position to possibly make thousands--then her testimony will be in question.

Oh, dear. You say "in question" as if all one must do is pose a question, never mind "the answer", as in Amber's testimony was verified; it didn't rest on her say-so.

Next faulty point, please.

398 posted on 12/07/2004 12:15:14 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson