It is always heard from friends and neighbors, "I can't believe he could have done such a thing."
Hey, it happens. My neighbors said the same thing when the police showed up and started digging up...never mind...forget I said anything.
Was he arrested in Tijuana? If not, then why is it relevant that he was seen there in what has been described as a disguise? If he was there, why wouldn't he stay there? The only things I really know about this case, is they replaced jurors and then got a quick consensus on a guilty verdict. It just seemed to me a way to use the entire jury pool, to get rid of anyone that would vote to acquit. How would anyone like to go through a trial fighting to bring reasonable doubt into the subject, only to have those that had such doubt, removed from the jury because of that doubt? Like I said, I am nearly completely ignorant of the facts in this case, and something seems a little fishy.
Hey! Certainly strippers in Tijuana need clothes and who wouldn't like a hamburger/taco after dancing all night.