Hi Paleo,
Which Thomas opinions do you think are not well written?
Also "we actually don't know much about his personal faith"? Remember that we're the side that thinks there should NOT be a religious test (or anti-religious test) for high office.
Thomas is a convert to Catholicism, but as Scalia is very fond of saying, if a justice does his job according to the contitution his personal opinions should be irrelevant. Remember, it's the OTHER side that says someone who is pro-life should eb excluded from the court.
Simply stated, Thomas is mysterious and (as I've already written) he isn't a brilliant member of the Court.
Which Thomas opinions do you think are not well written?
You should have addressed your response to alessandrofiaschi.