Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Harry Reid will not vote to affirm either, so who cares what the slimeball thinks.

Well you are right about that. I probably shouldn't have made the Reid reference because his comments were way out of bounds vis a vis Thomas. I was really only referring to his positive comments about Scalia.

I won't be disappointed if Bush goes for Thomas. I just think Scalia would be the better choice.

45 posted on 12/07/2004 7:54:50 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint
I think Reid is getting ready to blind side Justice Scalia with ethics accusations if he's nominated.

Maybe thinking that a shot across Justice Thomas's bow will discourage him from going through that "high tech lynching" again . . .

46 posted on 12/07/2004 7:58:08 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint
I won't be disappointed if Bush goes for Thomas. I just think Scalia would be the better choice.

Either would be a great choice - they are by far the most conservative Justices (strict Contitutionalists). I just wish there were 7 more like them on the court.

47 posted on 12/07/2004 8:15:48 AM PST by 4CJ (Laissez les bon FReeps rouler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson