Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Diocese in Spokane Files for Bankruptcy [Roman Catholic: avoids WA clergy sexual abuse trials]
AP via yahoo ^ | Dec 6, 2004 | NICHOLAS K. GERANIOS

Posted on 12/06/2004 7:22:25 PM PST by Mike Fieschko

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: ExtremeUnction

My experience is quite different from yours. Hoping that a religion with 60 million followers in the US becomes destitute because of the actions of a few is not what I would consider "Christian". Do you?


41 posted on 12/06/2004 9:02:54 PM PST by wrathof59 (semper ubi sub ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Odd...and sad:

Date of Incorporation: 07/12/1915


The diocese didn't exist until December 1913, when it was formed out of territory of the Seattle Diocese. I don't understand the 'odd ... and sad' part.
42 posted on 12/06/2004 9:06:14 PM PST by Mike Fieschko ("Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
None of the "criminals" if any were named in this case would have any money. Thus the non-dischageability issue is irrelevant. The plaintiffs would have had to sue the Vatican and/or other diocese as aiders and abettors, co-conspirators and/or alter egos. It appears they did not, or if they did, they were not held liable.
43 posted on 12/06/2004 9:21:05 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
As I get older I think I am getting the hang of these Religions.

It is to the point of what Club that you want to belong to. Elks, Moose, Legion, etc. It is all about the money.

Of course, what Flavor you were brought up on means everything because no one else was any good.

I remember a nun telling me that if I became a protestant, I was going to Hell. I think she believed that crap.

44 posted on 12/06/2004 9:25:23 PM PST by AGreatPer (See You At The Freeper Ball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
In its filing, the diocese listed assets of $11.1 million and liabilities of $81.3 million — the vast majority being sexual abuse claims.

Only $11.1 in assets. The real property must not be included in this amount.

45 posted on 12/06/2004 9:26:49 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

If the Vatican does not step up to plate, and pay off the unpaid liabilities through a collection effort, it will lose far more in moral authority than the dollars saved is my guess. It is their choice. Will they do what is just, moral and right? The ball is in their court. I assume the real estate (churches) will be put up for auction, and the Vatican will repurchase them, or urge the local flock to put up the bucks to do so.


46 posted on 12/06/2004 9:31:22 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
"Odd and sad" that all the worship, family, and community service since 1915 suddenly comes crashing down in this distainful manner.
47 posted on 12/06/2004 9:34:02 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Torie

At a certain point negligence becomes criminal. As I indicated it depends on the specifics.

If you are correct, this means the creditor/victims get zero.


48 posted on 12/06/2004 9:35:10 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mears
The diocese faces claims that already total some $77 million, and Chapter 11 bankruptcy is the best way to ensure that all victims are treated fairly and that the church continues its mission, Bishop William Skylstad said.

This is nothing in the world but a last ditch effort to cover the butts of those who are guilty of pedifilia and those who are responsibile for protecting the helpless victims from these monsters.

I wonder if these butt coverers think they can also blind the eyes of God.

PAYDAY SOMEDAY!

49 posted on 12/06/2004 9:36:17 PM PST by VOYAGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

In our diocese each parish is incorporated separately but the buildings and land is all in the bishop's name so I don't know how it works.


50 posted on 12/06/2004 9:37:08 PM PST by tiki (Won one against the Flipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Torie

The diocese carry several layers of risk insurance, and will also pay some of the claims, since it's being reported that they are also parties to the Settlement Agreemnet. The amount paid by the carriers may be substantial.

Sorry to all the Catholic bashers and haters, but the Church is not going down.


51 posted on 12/07/2004 6:50:11 AM PST by wrathof59 (semper ubi sub ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wrathof59
My experience is quite different from yours. Hoping that a religion with 60 million followers in the US becomes destitute because of the actions of a few is not what I would consider "Christian".

I think that we are really not that far off. I think that I've taken my argument off on another tangent a bit. Growing up I had the unique opportunity to see our local priests in action. I worked five night's a week answering the door and phone at a rectory with five priests (they ran a high school). I was put off by the Pastor's never-ending quest for $$. He acted more like a businessman than a priest. On the other hand, the rectory housed the most decent man I've ever met. The other priests would not come down to talk to someone who came to the door looking for help. Most were men down on their luck with a family of five kids living in their car. This priest would ALWAYS come down, and open his own wallet and hand the man a $20 bill (a lot in 1965). When I am feeling stingy about giving to a charity, I always think back to that priest, and then open my wallet.

52 posted on 12/07/2004 7:29:00 AM PST by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wrathof59

The Dallas Morning News started a series in June of this year on scores of cases in which Church officials are continuing, to this very day, to hide perverts by transfering them around between parishes and countries. In many cases, the Church claims it cannot find these pervs, who were easily located by reporters. An overview:



Runaway priests hiding in plain sight

06:11 PM CDT on Monday, June 21, 2004

Catholic priests accused of sexually abusing children are hiding abroad and working in church ministries, The Dallas Morning News has found.
Also Online

Overview: Runaway priests hiding in plain sight

Part 1: Convicted sexual abuser and fugitive works with kids under his religious order's wing
• Government moves to deport fugitive priest

Part 2: Cardinal offered sanctuary to admitted molester
• En español: Intocable

Part 3: Cleric slipped out of U.S., continues to work in Mexico
• En español: Sin penitencia
• Letters:
In English: 1 | 2 | 3
En español: 1 | 2 | 3

Part 4: Church aid, legal lapses leave cleric free to roam
• En español: Iglesia brinda santuario a cura fugitivoa
• Salesians dispute report that they moved suspects in abuse

Multimedia: Runaway Priests

Print: .pdf versions of DMN pages
• June 20: 1A | 20A | 21A | 22A
• June 21: 1A | 8A | 9A
• June 22: 1A | 10A | 11A
• June 23: 1A | 12A | 13A

From Africa to Latin America to Europe to Asia, these priests have started new lives in unsuspecting communities, often with the help of church officials. They are leading parishes, teaching and continuing to work in settings that bring them into contact with children, despite church claims to the contrary.

The global movement has gone largely unnoticed -- even after an abuse scandal swept the U.S. Catholic Church in 2002, forcing bishops to adopt a "zero tolerance" policy and drawing international attention.

Starting this week and continuing in coming months, we report the results of a yearlong investigation that reaches all six occupied continents. Key findings include: Nearly half of the more than 200 cases we identified involve clergy who tried to elude law enforcement. About 30 remain free in one country while facing ongoing criminal inquiries, arrest warrants or convictions in another.

Most runaway priests remain in the church, the world's largest organization, so they should be easier to locate than other fugitives.

Instead, Catholic leaders have used international transfers to thwart justice, a practice that poses far greater challenges to law enforcement than the domestic moves exposed in the 2002 scandal.

Police and prosecutors, however, often fail to take basic steps to catch fugitive priests.

Church discipline, such as the U.S. bishops' new policy, doesn't keep all offenders out of ministry. Dozens of priests who are no longer eligible to work in this country have found sanctuary abroad.



Now, go home and get your shinebox.


53 posted on 12/07/2004 7:45:05 AM PST by Luddite Patent Counsel ("Evil is just plain bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: duckln

I don't believe that priest-bashing should be the new indoor sport for the 21st century. I have known many holy priests. However, I believe that the Catholic heirarchy, especially the USCCB, is corrupt beyond imagination. I pray every day that God will intervene, and give someone the courage and power to clean house. Clearly, that is not happening now.


54 posted on 12/07/2004 8:05:11 AM PST by Luddite Patent Counsel ("Evil is just plain bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Luddite Patent Counsel

It's the Catholic church as an institution that I have always had a problem with,not the Catholic church as a place of worship.


55 posted on 12/07/2004 8:16:52 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Luddite Patent Counsel

Not totally convinced, NO specifics in your news papaer article, although I have heard of a few flleing the country after they were defrocked. Taking the MSM at its word when they are attacking Christians is not what this conservative swallows wholesale.

Your posts are obviously meant to bas the Catholic religion. DU seems up your alley, since you have no specific facts to back up your wholesale condemnation of religious institutions with 60 million members in the US alone. Many are very conservative and want to these these sickos behind bars more than anything else.

For you to allude that all Catholics are naive or indifferent or tolerant of these abuses is ludicrous.

What does the shoe shine box mean,? please elaborate. Thanks


56 posted on 12/07/2004 8:28:11 AM PST by wrathof59 (semper ubi sub ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: wrathof59

What I gave you was a summary. A "summary", you see, gives an overview of one or more things to give you an idea of that which is contained therein. If you want specific, detailed reports on the cases that are "summarized", you have to read almost six month's worth articles. If you really want to inform yourself, rather than persist in ignorance, I suggest that you go to the Dallas Morning News site, pull up each of the articles, and read them (or have someone read them to you). There are plenty of facts there. Conservatives who are worthy of the name are eager to examine facts, rather than clinging to ignorant assumptions.

I can assure you that I have no desire to "bas" the Catholic religion. Unlike the vast majority of the 60 million Catholics you cite, most of whom see the inside of a church three times in their lives, I am a very Traditional Catholic.

As to "shine box", Google is your friend.


57 posted on 12/07/2004 8:53:43 AM PST by Luddite Patent Counsel ("Evil is just plain bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Luddite Patent Counsel

I'm asking you to provise specifics for your wholesale condemnation of the entire Catholic Church. You have not provided any>

I have asked you about a shoe shine remark you directed at me. You did not answer but pointed me to "Google".

Don't get into a discussion if you can't back up your words. You lack any credibility.


58 posted on 12/07/2004 9:00:29 AM PST by wrathof59 (semper ubi sub ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: wrathof59

You really want to be spoon-fed, don't you? I give you a reference that requires you to read further for more details, and you can't. I suggest you use Google to look up the background of one of the best-known cultural references in America, and you can't. Who helps you log on here? Sorry, but I am not your mommy. There is none so blind as he who will not see.


59 posted on 12/07/2004 9:30:42 AM PST by Luddite Patent Counsel ("Evil is just plain bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Luddite Patent Counsel

"The Church is still playing a shell game with pedophile presbyters. If you think this all ended in 1990, you are delusional."

Time for you to put up or shut up, and a simple google search with that POS MSM article you posted above ain't gonna cut it buddy. That's horse shit journalism.

You don't have any specific cases since 1990. And your "go home shoe shine" ain't gonna cut it either.

Calling people delusional is not in your best interest when your argument is based on BS.

You can't back any of your posts.



60 posted on 12/07/2004 11:02:06 AM PST by wrathof59 (semper ubi sub ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson