Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas_Jarhead

Don't bet on it.

About 5 years ago my company instituted benefits for "domestic partners".

The gay crowd was all enthusiastic, but come to find out, if you had a live in girlfriend, even if she'd been there for 10 years, would NOT qualify.

If this is not discrimination, I don't know what is.


3 posted on 12/06/2004 5:22:44 PM PST by EEDUDE (Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: EEDUDE

How about by doggy?? Will she qualify???


John


5 posted on 12/06/2004 5:31:55 PM PST by jrfaug06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: EEDUDE

I am sure that if they were allowed to have civil unions that weren't as convenient as “domestic partnerships” recognized by certain organizations, then they would be happy too.

As for those who want to enter into “domestic partnership” with a friend of the same sex, go ahead. It is not that different to a marriage of convenience which have been going on for millennia, and in case of royalty, were state sanctioned.


9 posted on 12/06/2004 5:55:35 PM PST by eladamry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson