Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertarianInExile

"Common sense"

LOL!!


62 posted on 12/06/2004 4:00:26 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Max Combined

"There is a huge qualitative difference between "screening" someone on the one hand, and physically patting them down on the other. Perhaps this woman, who happened to be a former Congresscritter, didn't like the idea of being groped. Perhaps she, like MILLIONS of others, is ticked off at the idea that a little old lady was getting the third degree when every single day young Moslem males get a free pass in the name of "political correctness" [hawk, spit].

I am all for security, not particularly wanting to end my life by crashing into a building for the greater good of some religious fanatics who despise our country, but it must make sense (which our current screening procedures assuredly do NOT). Further, even though the government has a certain amount of authority, that authority is not unlimited. PITA she may have been, but we can't know that from the limited information here - however, PITA or not, she had a right to question where the government agents got their authority to touch her body.

The day that the gov't can do anything to us in the name of security (and we are nearly there), is the day that we've officially lost our liberties and the terrorists have won by destroying what the US used to be."

Point out where any of this is less than common sense, laughing boy.


78 posted on 12/06/2004 4:18:25 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson