Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paradox
The problem with using existing EELVs, like Delta-IV, is that you still have to launch 150 mT to LEO for a manned lunar mission. That means about 10 Delta-IV heavys, just to get the stuff into space. Then you have to assemble your vehicle in orbit.

One thing that Station has taught us that while it's possible to do on-orbit assembly, it's not desirable. It increases risk and cost. It creates numerous problems of its own. The real lesson of ISS is to minimize on-orbit assembly. Developing a real Heavy Lift vehicle does just that.

16 posted on 12/06/2004 9:21:01 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Cincinatus
One thing that Station has taught us that while it's possible to do on-orbit assembly, it's not desirable. It increases risk and cost. It creates numerous problems of its own. The real lesson of ISS is to minimize on-orbit assembly. Developing a real Heavy Lift vehicle does just that.

I have read that this very point was one of two that brought Von Braun around to the LOR concept for Apollo, having been previously an apostle of EOR. The other being the massive size of the landing vehicle that would be wrought by going the EOR route. All very valid points. The challenges of assembly in zero gravity vacuum are quite daunting compared with tinkering things together in a terrestrial environment. That's not to say it can't be done, because we and others have done it. It's just lot more bother.

21 posted on 12/06/2004 9:30:42 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson