Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Leak Case, Reporters Lack Shield For Sources
Washington Post ^ | 11-29-04 | Charles Lane

Posted on 12/05/2004 4:30:47 PM PST by Snapple

One intriguing possibility, noted by several lawyers familiar with the case, is that Novak may have invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, and that Fitzgerald has not yet chosen to give him immunity from prosecution to compel his testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; cialeak; fitzgerald; josephwilson; leaks; novak; plame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 last
To: Snapple

I don't know why you're yelling it at me. I'm already aware it has to do with WH officials who want their good names cleared and want these reporters to admit Libby and they did not leak Plame's name. The WH officials have signed confidentiality waivers!

(In case you still don't get it, that means they are NOT the source, hence you still have zero evidence that the WH leaked)


181 posted on 12/07/2004 4:21:36 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Snapple
He has claimed White House in his own columns.

I don't know how I missed this comment of yours from earlier. That is a flat out lie. Novak has most certainly not said the White House was his source. "Administration officials" is what he said, which applies to anyone who works at the CIA, State, etc. He has said it was NOT the WH.

182 posted on 12/07/2004 4:29:15 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Novak:
"My role and the role of the Bush White House have been distorted and need explanation."

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/rn20031001.shtml

Of course, the fact that Fitzgerals has been interviewing all the White House people is good evidence, too.



183 posted on 12/08/2004 4:19:23 PM PST by Snapple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Snapple
See the part where Novak says "White House" and "distorted"??

We've gone over that before. It buttresses my point, not yours. As does the WH personnel who are cooperating (unlike some of the media that have been called).

184 posted on 12/08/2004 4:47:00 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Administration Officials are people with political appointments from the current Administration.

Career professionals are not considered Administration Officials.


185 posted on 12/08/2004 5:25:36 PM PST by Snapple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

I think that when Novak uses the word "distorted" he means that the information was not given to him as part of a vendetta but to explain why it happened that Joe Wilson, a Democrat, was sent to Niger.

He is explaining that the revelation was not meant to damage this lady but to explain the choice of Wilson.


186 posted on 12/08/2004 5:29:41 PM PST by Snapple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson