And yet we're somehow to believe Rumsfeld and Bush are responsible for Abu Gharib. And Reagan for Iran-Contra.
Which is it, my liberal friends? Are superiors responsible for the actions of their underlings or are they not?
Simple question, what's your answer?
And Dick Cheney is still responsible for Halliburton.
"And yet we're somehow to believe Rumsfeld and Bush are responsible for Abu Gharib. And Reagan for Iran-Contra."
What's your problem.........can't they have it every way?
How unfair of you.
But......Dick Cheney is "responsible" for anything Halliburton does YEARS after he is CEO. Kofi is innocent because he has "denied" the charges. Man I wish I was liberal so I could be so illogical and hypocritical. Just imagine if a republican had overseen the transfer of BILLIONS of dollars to a dictator who then bought WMD used against thousands of innocent people (while starving them) all the while claiming to be buying food, medicine, etc. This would be considered a war crime. But since this is an AntiAmerican socialist. It's completely OK.