Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Raytheon 'heat beam' weapon ready for Iraq
Boston Business Journal ^ | 12/01/04

Posted on 12/05/2004 1:23:24 PM PST by blink182prj

Government defense giant Raytheon Co. has developed the first nonlethal weapon that fires a heat beam to repel enemies and reduces the chance of innocent civilians being shot, a Pentagon official said.

Raytheon, the world's largest missile maker, delivered a prototype to the U.S. military last month. The product is expected to be evaluated from February through June to determine whether to equip U.S. forces with it, Colonel David Karcher, director of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, told Bloomberg Business News.

With U.S. casualties in Iraq rising, expectations are growing that Raytheon's weapon, called the Active Denial System, could be sent to Iraq in the next year, according to Charles "Sid'' Heal, commander of the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department. A former Marine, Heal headed nonlethal-weapons training for the U.S. military in Somalia in 1995 and advised Raytheon on the beam's development.

"It's there, it's ready,'' said Heal, who has felt the weapon's beam and compares it to having a hot iron placed on the skin. "It will likely be in Iraq in the next 12 months. They are very, very close.''

The weapon, mounted on a Humvee vehicle, projects a "focused, speed-of-light millimeter wave energy beam to induce an intolerable heating sensation,'' according to a U.S. Air Force fact sheet. The energy penetrates less than 1/64 of an inch into the skin and the sensation ceases when the target moves out of the beam.

The weapon could be used for crowd control and is effective beyond the range of bullets fired by small arms, Karcher said. The effective range of an AK-47 assault rifle is as far as 273 yards, while an M16A2 rifle has a range of 400 meters.

The primary benefit would be protecting U.S. troops, Heal said. The weapon would also limit deaths of noncombatants, he said.

"This forces your adversary to declare intentions,'' Heal said. "U.S. forces get killed because they are reluctant to shoot. It happens in Iraq every day."

"This is where the future is going,'' Raytheon Chief Executive William Swanson, 55, said at a conference in Tucson, Ariz., where he introduced the weapon to investors Wednesday. "This is the ability to protect our troops, and we're talking about the speed of light.''

Raytheon is two years into a four-year, $40 million development contract, Karcher said. How soon the weapon is deployed will depend on the military's interest, and while the technology may be ready, troops must also be trained on it and engagement rules must be decided by a four-star general, he said.

Heal said the military version would cost about $1 million, and the U.S. military could require many.

Karcher said the first prototype cost about $10 million.

Heal told Bloomberg Business News that Raytheon could expand the market by selling a smaller version to law-enforcement agencies. The company is working on a smaller, tripod-mounted version for police forces, and the price would have to come down to a few hundred thousand dollars each to be affordable, he said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: miltech; nonlethal; raytheon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2004 1:23:25 PM PST by blink182prj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blink182prj
If you're a Democrat, this is your require response:


THIS MUST BE STOPPED!!! NOW!!! WE CANNOT ALLOW OUR MILITARY TO DEVELOP WEAPONS THAT ACTUALLY LET THEM WIN BATTLES!!!

Pretty sick ideology, if you ask me.
2 posted on 12/05/2004 1:31:46 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blink182prj
It will likely be in Iraq in the next 12 months.

A crowd control weapon? Are we going to be controlling crowds in Iraq? Or using non lethal weapons against terrorist?

3 posted on 12/05/2004 1:32:38 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Joe Hadenuf
Are we going to be controlling crowds in Iraq? Or using non lethal weapons against terrorist?

Well, I suppose a weapon like this will keep an angry mob from turning into an angry mob of terrorists.

5 posted on 12/05/2004 1:36:35 PM PST by Mudcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blink182prj
'Turbaned Tater Tots!

hehehe Yeah, I know I'm a sick puppy!
6 posted on 12/05/2004 1:39:01 PM PST by 45semi (Man has only those rights he can defend...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blink182prj

Smokin'!


7 posted on 12/05/2004 1:41:22 PM PST by toddlintown (Pull another beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: blink182prj
They should develop something like this to aim at the ground in front of their Humvee to detonate these damned roadside bombs before they get there.
10 posted on 12/05/2004 1:48:00 PM PST by ThirstyMan (Why is it, All the dead seem to vote for Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
Well, I suppose a weapon like this will keep an angry mob from turning into an angry mob of terrorists.

So you are implying this will be used in Iraq against Iraqi citiens in an effort to keep them from becoming terrorist?

OOOK.

11 posted on 12/05/2004 1:48:12 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dcuddeback
I know that I am jumping ahead of this weapon's intentions and possible spin-offs, all miraculous I'm sure, but I'm left with the question: when did it become unthinkable to kill our enemies? This is probably the surest route to victory. We've gotten to the point that we are sacrificing our soldiers in an effort to save enemy combatants. That our young men would fight under these conditions is indicative of, well, good soldering, I suppose....
12 posted on 12/05/2004 1:48:53 PM PST by ashtanga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf

Er, citizens too.....


13 posted on 12/05/2004 1:48:57 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blink182prj

I can't help thinking that a .50 cal M2HB would be a more effective source of "heat".


14 posted on 12/05/2004 1:49:29 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blink182prj

They should develop something like this to aim at the ground in front of their Humvees to detonate these damned roadside bombs before they get there.


15 posted on 12/05/2004 1:50:29 PM PST by ThirstyMan (Why is it, All the dead seem to vote for Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcuddeback
I wonder if such weapons could be configured to sweep ahead of convoys and cook-off IEDs.

Hey! (see my post 15) you thought of it first! But it is a great idea.

16 posted on 12/05/2004 1:54:33 PM PST by ThirstyMan (Why is it, All the dead seem to vote for Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blink182prj

Maybe if you tape bags of popcorn on your chest, it'll be like reactive armor.


17 posted on 12/05/2004 1:54:51 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blink182prj
The product is expected to be evaluated from February through June to determine whether to equip U.S. forces with it, Colonel David Karcher, director of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, told Bloomberg Business News.

Can they evaluate it by using it on the left side of Congress, or would that be inappropriate?

18 posted on 12/05/2004 1:55:12 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf

Mylar space blanket? A use for tinfoil underware? Anything that would reflect or deflect a significant portion of the radiant energy oughta do it. Been wondering about using a "space blanket" to sheild from being seen on thermal imagers.


19 posted on 12/05/2004 1:57:13 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blink182prj
who has felt the weapon's beam and compares it to having a hot iron placed on the skin

Sure this is non-lethal, but what are you going to do with this kind of heat on you? I think this is pretty cool.

20 posted on 12/05/2004 1:59:06 PM PST by kizzdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson