Without reading the entire article, it seems his problem was with the Clinton Administration. Why not the books and the headlines in 2000?
Exactly! Just what could have kept him from disclosing these things when it may have actually helped prevent terrorist attacks? Tell me that, Mr. Scheuer, and I may be interested in what else you have to say.
Admittedly, the market for such stories spiked shortly after September 11, 2001.
Because the INFERENCE is that he was unhappy with the Bush admin .. exactly what the spin media loves .. and will continue to spin in that direction because it fits their agenda.
However, the public knows Bush didn't really take charge of the CIA until Porter Goss took over .. only now is Bush responsible for what goes on IMHO.