[Oztrich Boy]

About one-third say it is supported by evidence, one-third see it as bunk and one-third don't know enough to judge.

I suspect there is some overlap there.

[rhetor]

For that matter, literal creationism is supported by evidence too. It depends on what we mean by terms such as "evidence" and "supported." Old William Paley's arguments for the existence of design in nature -- and therefore a Designer -- are still basically sound. Scientists like Michael Behe simply show how the argument applies with even more force on the microscopic/biochemical level.