Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: How FBI set up AIPAC
Jerusalem Post ^ | 12/5/4 | JANINE ZACHARIA

Posted on 12/04/2004 5:53:55 PM PST by SmithL

WASHINGTON -- AIPAC, the powerhouse pro-Israel lobby currently embroiled in allegations of spying for Israel, was set up by the FBI, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

FBI agents used a courier, Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin, to draw two senior AIPAC officials who already knew him into accepting what he described to them as "classified" information, reliable government and other sources intimately familiar with the investigation have told the Post.

One of the AIPAC pair then told diplomats at the Israeli Embassy in Washington about the "classified" information, which claimed Iranians were monitoring and planning to kidnap and kill Israelis operating in the Kurdish areas in northern Iraq, the Post has been told.

It is unclear whether the "classified" information was real or bogus.

AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) denies any wrongdoing.

Knowingly transferring classified information to a foreign power can be a breach of US espionage statutes. Legal experts have told the Post that passing on bogus classified information may be used to demonstrate intent to violate the law but does not itself constitute a crime.

Franklin, an Iran expert, was already under investigation by the FBI for allegedly passing classified information to AIPAC when, the Post's sources say, FBI counterintelligence agents approached him to play a central role in the setup operation this past summer.

The FBI had been monitoring AIPAC's activities for some two years when, last year, its agents observed two AIPAC officials, Steve Rosen, director of foreign policy issues, and Keith Weissman, a senior Middle East analyst with the lobby, at a lunch meeting with Franklin in Washington.

At this lunch, it has been widely reported, Franklin allegedly briefed the AIPAC pair on the content of a draft national security presidential directive on Iran.

Details of the draft, which included proposed measures the US could employ to destabilize the Iranian regime, were already circulating at the time. According to some reports, an Israeli diplomat at the embassy in Washington, Naor Gilon, was also present at the lunch.

Earlier this year, the FBI informed Franklin that, as a consequence of the lunch meeting, he was under investigation. The Pentagon analyst, hoping for leniency, agreed to cooperate with FBI agents in what would become the setting up of AIPAC, a process designed to bust the lobby for passing secrets to Israel.

The FBI agents told Franklin to request a meeting with Rosen and Weissman. He initiated contact with the AIPAC pair, and told them that he needed to discuss a ticking-bomb situation.

Franklin was then dispatched to meet the two AIPAC officials and outline the alleged threat to Israelis in northern Iraq, the Post has been told.

Saying his access to the White House was limited, Franklin also expressed concern that the Bush administration was underestimating the extent to which Iranian agents were operating in Iraq and asked the AIPAC officials to stress this point in their meetings with US officials.

The agents' hope, plainly, was that the AIPAC pair would be so troubled by the apparent life-and-death content of the information from Franklin as to risk a breach of US espionage statutes and transfer what they believed to be classified material to a foreign power, Israel.

And that, the Post has been told, is precisely what happened.

Franklin, according to news reports, cooperated with the FBI until about two months ago. In early October, he abruptly stopped working with authorities, dropped his court-appointed attorney and sought the legal counsel of Plato Cacheris, a prominent Washington defense lawyer who has represented numerous accused spies.

"Obviously his was a bad deal," says one source familiar with Franklin's decision to stop cooperating with the bureau.

News of the initial Franklin-AIPAC lunch broke last summer: CBS led its August 27 Nightly News broadcast with a report of a "full-fledged espionage investigation under way," saying the FBI was about to "roll up" a suspected Israeli "mole" in the office of the secretary of defense in the Pentagon.

CBS reported that, using wiretaps, undercover surveillance and photography, the FBI had documented the passing of a classified presidential directive on Iran from the suspected mole to two people who work at AIPAC. Sources familiar with the matter, however, said no documents exchanged hands.

CBS's sensational allegation immediately conjured up memories of the Pollard affair, the 1985 arrest and subsequent conviction in 1987 and life imprisonment for espionage of US naval intelligence analyst Jonathan Pollard for passing classified information to Israel.

The investigation into Franklin and the AIPAC officials continued quietly, with little subsequent media coverage, in recent months. No indictments were issued and most reports scaled back the accusations against Franklin from alleged espionage to mishandling of classified evidence.

But the investigation burst back into prominence last Wednesday, when FBI agents made their first visit to AIPAC's Capitol Hill offices since August. Armed with a warrant, the agents seized computer files related to Rosen and Weissman and issued subpoenas to four senior officials at the lobby, requesting that they appear before a grand jury later this month in the Eastern District of Virginia.

Agents had copied Rosen's computer hard drive during their previous visit.

The four subpoenaed officials, who are considered witnesses, not targets, of the investigation, are AIPAC Executive Director Howard Kohr, Managing Director Richard Fishman, Communications Director Renee Rothstein and Research Director Rafi Danziger.

A Washington criminal justice expert said Friday that the issuing of the subpoenas suggested the FBI was "getting ready to indict."

AIPAC has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.

"AIPAC has done nothing wrong. Neither AIPAC nor any member of our staff has broken any law, nor has AIPAC or its employees ever received information they believed was secret or classified. We continue to cooperate fully with the governmental authorities and believe any court of law or grand jury will conclude that AIPAC employees have always acted legally, properly and appropriately," AIPAC said in a statement.

"Despite the false and baseless allegations that have been reported, AIPAC will not be distracted from our central mission of supporting America's interests in the Middle East and advocating for a strong relationship with Israel," the statement said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aipac; china; donaldwkeyser; fbi; franklin; gaysaddnapalmkeyword; iran; jstapletonroy; keyser; larryfranklin; media; napalminthemorning; pollardisstillguilty; religionofpeace; roy; totalbullshit; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 12/04/2004 5:53:55 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If this is true, it's totally nuts. Everyone knows that the CIA needs to be cleaned out, but so does the FBI. The people responsible for Ruby Ridge, Waco, Oklahoma City, and the failure to investigate al Qaeda are all still in place, being promoted and rewarded by Sessions.

Sessions must go. Clinton set the precedent when he fired the director of the FBI right before Vincent Foster was killed. Bush has a more legitimate excuse. Sessions was a lousy appointment. Bush needs to find someone competent to take his place and clean house.


2 posted on 12/04/2004 6:34:35 PM PST by Cicero (Nil illegitemus carborundum est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
News of the initial Franklin-AIPAC lunch broke last summer: CBS led its August 27 Nightly News broadcast with a report of a "full-fledged espionage investigation under way," saying the FBI was about to "roll up" a suspected Israeli "mole" in the office of the secretary of defense in the Pentagon.

I wonder if this is an attempt to discredit the Sec. of Defence at the same time.

3 posted on 12/04/2004 6:42:20 PM PST by airborne (God bless and keep our fallen heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"The agents' hope, plainly, was that the AIPAC pair would be so troubled by the apparent life-and-death content of the information from Franklin as to risk a breach of US espionage statutes and transfer what they believed to be classified material to a foreign power, Israel."

Let me get this right, our FBI entrapped these men by threatening the death of a colleague? Nobility and loyalty illegal?

This is perverse and evil.

Whoever set these men up should be shot.

4 posted on 12/04/2004 6:44:01 PM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This blows. How are "lobbyists" supposed to know what really is or isn't "classified" and how "classified" could they think it really is if some guy who isn't that inside gives them the info? And how would it be undermining the U.S. to tell someone at the Israeli embassy that Israelis in Kurdish areas may be targetted?


5 posted on 12/04/2004 6:45:38 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl (OMGIIHIHOIIC ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
FBI agents used a courier...to draw two senior AIPAC officials who already knew him into accepting what he described to them as "classified" information...

One of the AIPAC pair then told diplomats at the Israeli Embassy in Washington about the "classified" information, which claimed Iranians were monitoring and planning to kidnap and kill Israelis operating in the Kurdish areas in northern Iraq.

It is unclear whether the "classified" information was real or bogus.

Saving a human life however is not "bogus".

[PSSSSST, Over here pal! I heard that XXXX has plans and are ready to kidnap and kill your family. Here's the info, but don't try to stop them.]

When the almost the rest of the UN is against you and everything you stand for what is the point of setting up one of the few friendly nations?

6 posted on 12/04/2004 6:46:07 PM PST by perfect stranger (Godel, Escher and Bach. The Eternal Golden Braid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If I knew of confidential information that may be used to save the lives of allies of the United States(in this case Israel), I'd pass it along also.

Also,

"A Washington criminal justice expert said Friday that the issuing of the subpoenas suggested the FBI was "getting ready to indict."

Since when does the FBI have the same power as the Department of Justice? I am under the assumption that the FBI is purely an Federal investigative police agency and don't have the power to 'indict' anyone.


7 posted on 12/04/2004 6:47:24 PM PST by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Who is Sessions?


8 posted on 12/04/2004 6:54:33 PM PST by lancer (If you are not with us, you are against us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
"perverse and evil"

And criminal. Treason.

Treason is what the FBI did. It was an act of ciminal treason. Providing aid and comfort to our enemies in Iran and Iraq.

9 posted on 12/04/2004 6:55:08 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

It was criminal treason on the part of the FBI. You do NOT endanger the lifes of allies on the ground with you in enemy territory without it being a form of Treason.


10 posted on 12/04/2004 6:56:58 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Why go thru this much trouble to set up an Israeli PAC when there are many others PACs that openly work with the enemy?willing to do much worse? Like ACLU, PP, NEA, NOW ect.

IIRC when Hoover set up the FBI he had the idea that it should be swept clean every 10 years.

11 posted on 12/04/2004 6:59:36 PM PST by perfect stranger (Godel, Escher and Bach. The Eternal Golden Braid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; Fedora

fyi


12 posted on 12/04/2004 7:15:30 PM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
First of all Sessions has been gone for years. The current FBI Director's name is Mueller. A former Deputy Attorney General. Louis Freeh, a former agent, Assistant U.S. Attorney and Federal Judge preceded Mueller. Second, what did FBI have to do with Oklahoma City? It seems to me they caught the guy pretty quickly and he was executed. I know conspiracy theorists abound, but McVey admitted it, and recent revelations show so did Terry Nicols. Thirdly, Ruby Ridge was a U.S. Marshals operation were they tried to execute a warrant for a white-supremist wanted on gun charges. Two Marshals were killed in initial raid. FBI sniper, called in much later was given order to shoot at an armed suspect out side cabin who was shooting at police helicopter. Hit his intended target, but bullet passed through him and killed suspects wife. Not exactly Gestapo tactics. Fourthly, WACO was an ATF operation. Several ATF agents killed in initial raid. Real problem was standoff was allowed to continue for so long. Crazy branch Davidian's set themselves on fire. I know attacks on FBI were common to get at Clinton, but real stories of all these incidents is seldom told. As to this story, don't believe everything you read. Israel is biggest spy on US. Ever hear of Julius and Ethel ROSENBERG? Of course Jerusalem Post calls it a set up. Note they "already knew" the guy who allegedly passed the "set up" information and that he himself was under investigation! Do you think maybe, he had already passed classified info to Israeli's and was caught and asked to do it again as part of a plea deal, like any good investigator might do?? Maybe?? Do You think???
13 posted on 12/04/2004 7:17:04 PM PST by jedgarlives (Bush/Clinton/Clinton/Bush/Bush/Clinton? it could happen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jedgarlives

Read the entire article, sentence by sentence. Then look for the actual "facts".


14 posted on 12/04/2004 7:30:49 PM PST by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jedgarlives
"Thirdly, Ruby Ridge was a U.S. Marshals operation were they tried to execute a warrant for a white-supremist wanted on gun charges."

Not true - they did not have a warrant. They were surveilling.

FBI sniper, called in much later was given order to shoot at an armed suspect out side cabin who was shooting at police helicopter.

Not true-- no shots were fired at helicopter.

Hit his intended target, but bullet passed through him and killed suspects wife.

Not true -- bullet passed through Vickie Weaver first, then wounded Weaver's friend.

Source --- Idaho vs. Houriuchi

15 posted on 12/04/2004 7:33:00 PM PST by gatex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jedgarlives
What a mess your brain is.

Israel is biggest spy on US. Ever hear of Julius and Ethel ROSENBERG? Of course Jerusalem Post calls it a set up.

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were spying for the Soviet Union.

16 posted on 12/04/2004 7:44:34 PM PST by bad company (I'm a new Grandpa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The FBI is bad news for Jews.
The FBI is bad news for Americans.
The FBI is bad news.


17 posted on 12/04/2004 9:26:48 PM PST by sarah_f (Know Islam, Know Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: SJackson; Yehuda; Nachum; Paved Paradise; Thinkin' Gal; adam_az; Alouette; IFly4Him; Salem; ...

Ping.


19 posted on 12/04/2004 11:03:29 PM PST by yonif ("So perish all Thine enemies, O the Lord" - Judges 5:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FarRightTexasDude

Congratulations!

Pollard and the Liberty not only in one post, but one sentence!!

A+Bert sends his best!


20 posted on 12/04/2004 11:06:17 PM PST by sarah_f (Know Islam, Know Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson