Posted on 12/03/2004 7:34:52 PM PST by RWR8189
Now that I've thought about it, I'm not 100% confident of 4th Pres as Barnes' home church. I'll have to double-check with my friend in DC...But there is no doubt that he's evangelical. This friend of mine has heard his testimony.
Amen to that pb.
Those who despise him, better get out of his way.
The Democrat Party is full of SOBs, and Reid isn't their Senate leader for no reason...he's the chief SOB.
Yep--we will just have to use the mighty power of the FReepers to help get the extra Republicans elected in 2006.
I have been saying this since January, 2001. "Just wait for the second term." I hope he can do something about abortion.
I think Fred said on "Beltway Boys" one night that he was an evangelical Christian. I have heard him refer to his faith 5 or 6 times.
Strategery!
When they lionize Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, Algore and Bill Clinton, it doesn't take rocket science to understand their mental block.
I don't think there is a Democratic party anymore, it died four years ago. All that's left of what they were is a leftist, socialist, anarchist, destroy America at any cost cult.
W has done more to get rid of the inept liberals and increase the power of conservatives than, well, Bill Clinton did!
Bring on Hillary and the Dems will be a minority party for the next two generations.
If you are FOR democracy you are FOR socialism...
No democracy has ever existed that wasn't a socialist system. EVER..
Democracts are FOR democracy, and some republicans are FOR it TOO..
What is Bush for..?.. (read above)..
Democracy is the road to socialism. Karl Marx
Democracy is indispensable to socialism. The goal of socialism is communism. V.I. Lenin
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.- Karl Marx
Super!
'gonna print and put on frig to read every day and feel GOOOOD
THANKS!
I'll refrain from assessing which President will be deemed by history as greater, as I wish to avoid the competition of sorts that seems to arise among supporters when the two are mentioned. My personal attachment is greater to G.W. I admit, since I was only a child while Reagan was President.
I admire both men. God blessed this nation (and the world) at each moment when we needed his intervention most. Each man was gifted with the skilled "weaponry" essential to achieve victory in the climate existant at time office was/is held as he has done throughout our history.
Washinton, Lincoln and down through our years we've had the 'right man at the right time".
Bush's agenda in the 2nd term is aggressive. It is full of risks, I think that partly attracts the Prez. LOL
He'll continue to need prayerful intercession.
When it comes to socializing that's true. But when it comes to government growth, spending, and no vetoes, he's as inside the Beltway as it gets.
I don't know if it was my age or lack of interest but Reagan never captured my heart and mind in the way President Bush has. I didn't initially back him (I actually didn't like the little I read about him) in the 2000 race but went with a friend to see him at a primary campaign rally. I walked away converted and told everyone I knew that he was a sleeping giant. Little did I know what events would transpire or how he would rise to meet them.
Just gettin' on board are you? Most of us have been with W for years. Albeit, his domestic policies are much too socialist.
The extraordinary thing about Bush is his simplicity. By that I don't mean simpleton. He is very bright. He is stright ahead. The Democrats have not yet figured this out. If he says something I don't believe Bush has an ancillary calculus. If he says something you can believe him. The very best thing about the president is his core beliefs, which I think Mrs. Bush had a lot to do with. He has discombobulated them with his beliefs which are foreign to them. He is not ashamed to put his belief system front and center. Then they try to ascribe some meaning to it that they would have used it for. When he said Christ was the person who had the most influence on him , they all thought he was pandering to the Christian right. He was answering the question. When the pundents got thru dissecting his statement they didn't understand. But Bush and millions of fundamentalist and evangelicals did understand. He simply gave Jesus the preeminence in his life that the Lord deserved. Bush had them in derision. Now in his wake he has slayed all democrats,liberals, leftist media types. It must be sweet to see Dan Rather going down because of his own venom, after the way Rather tried to sandbag Bushes father. Bush has made nice nice with the left, but now must carry thru on the concervative prescriptions he spoke of in the campaign. Fundamentally President Bush is a good man who mean what he says and says what he means.
Just gettin' on board are you? Most of us have been with W for years. Albeit, his domestic policies are much too socialist. Regardless, he's one tough hombre.
I read an article a little while ago on "The Hill" website about Harry Reid, who took Daschle's place. Oh, boy, he is adding something like 17 new staff members, and is forming a Democrat War Room in Wellstone's old offices in order to get "more organized". He also said that if people think because he is "soft spoken" that he will be easier for the Republicans to deal with, forget it, he says he plans on making it harder on the Republicans by not only better organization in the Senate, but with the outside groups like NARAL, AFL/CIO, MOVE.ON.ORG, and other 527's.
Methinks we celebrated too soon. They also already have reams of notes on the records of every possible candidate that Bush will nominate for SCOTUS, with their records and their "negatives" ready to go as soon as name come up. That way their NEW press corps. will be able to get the smear job out before the Republicans can "promote" the candidate.
He then said, that they have to learn to smear people like the Republicans have done all these years, and that they (the Dems)have played "nice" for too long.
Don't take this the wrong way, but why would a good Texan like you be afraid of a rattlesnake like Reid.
He's planning NOTHING NEW! Smear our candidates? Line up all those radical Left groups? Stop being nice?? COME ON!! The 'Rats invented BORKING. They tried to smear Thomas. They still think those tactics will work?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.