Replies

Judge saying the charter can't be considered just because it may've been illegally ignored for 16? years.

Donna's lawyer claims the charter didn't spring back to life just because the CA State Supreme Court said Charter cities *can* limit and exlude a write-in candidate. Claims a court said a municipal action would have to brought to bring life back to the charter's provision.

Judge arguing it was not struck down, just held up. Female judge arguing too.

21 posted on 12/03/2004 12:06:28 PM PST by newzjunkey ("The rule of law has become confused with - indeed subverted by - the rule of judges." - Robert Bork)

Her lawyer claims the Charter provision continues to be null & void because he says so damn it! Much foot stomping. Please, please, please let us stay in to protect our voooooooters.

Zzzz. Again talking about 155,000 voters for Frye. That's at least the 3rd or 4th time.

Registrar of voters lawyer is up now! Yay. We need more lawyers. Judge doesn't see the registrar's interest because they're just acting in a ministerial capacity because they certify to the clerk, the clerk reports to the council and the council adopts a resolution and swears in the winners. Registrar lawyer sits down...

Some lawyer is up for unclear parties, voters perhaps?

22 posted on 12/03/2004 12:11:54 PM PST by newzjunkey ("The rule of law has become confused with - indeed subverted by - the rule of judges." - Robert Bork)