To: AntiGuv
So, in your reasoning, the fact that most people don't
mean "bow-legged" when they say "cute" is irrelevant? If it used to mean that to some people, it must always mean that to all people?
It's used as an irreverent, Christ-rejecting, cutesy short-cut. Christians shouldn't participate.
Dan
68 posted on
12/03/2004 8:23:01 AM PST by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
The initial question was about its origins. The answer is what it is.
74 posted on
12/03/2004 8:28:30 AM PST by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: BibChr
It's used as an irreverent, Christ-rejecting, cutesy short-cut. Christians shouldn't participate.
I find "BibChr" to be an irrevent, Christ-rejecting, cutesy short-cut for "Biblical Christianity." The fires of Hell are gonna feel mighty uncomfortable for you if don't repent and stop using that abbreviation right now!
75 posted on
12/03/2004 8:30:26 AM PST by
drjimmy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson