lol, I'm not arguing. Please go back and read the post I originally responded to. I do not like intellectual dishonesty, and can't stand a false argument. The poster I responded to basically said a bunch of nonsense. Yours and the other response to me did not take what I said in context, hence the lack of understanding.
My first encounter with you was in post #348, where you said you didn't think I'd read the article.
I read the article. I agree that Mrs. Thompson's actions don't constitute "a firing offense" but I also don't think that the discussion was appropriate with small children.
I'm not sure where you think I showed intellectual dishonesty or a false argument but you're welcome to point it out.