To: visualops; Amelia
Facts do not have political agendas or values. They may or may not support a particular viewpoint, but if a [liberal] person doesn't like a fact because it exposes a lie, then that's their problem. And I think you missed the point I was making - it may be factual and it may be true, but that does not, in and of itself, justify its dissemination in this manner. Consider the truth about where babies come from - do you really want the bus driver deciding how and when your kids learn those facts?
466 posted on
12/04/2004 6:14:49 PM PST by
general_re
("What's plausible to you is unimportant." - D'man)
To: general_re
I'll repeat myself:
If you want to make the argument that a bus driver shouldn't talk to the kids about anything but the weather, then do that, but don't make strawman arguments and misrepresent the facts of the incident.
That comment was directed to whom I was speaking. What part of that don't you get? If you're going to post to me, try and follow the conversation, or we'll all go around in circles.
472 posted on
12/04/2004 7:19:40 PM PST by
visualops
(It's easier to build a child than repair an adult.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson