Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius

I thought I had read that a candidate could request a partial recount (at their expense), and that if it produced enough of a change to alter the outcome, the law required the entire state to be recounted at taxpayer expense. Either that isn't true, or this is a strange stand for Gregoire to be taking.


29 posted on 12/02/2004 12:31:25 PM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BlackRazor

Gregoire is feeling the heat - from papers that endorsed her. She knows if she asks for a partial recount in selected areas, and somehow pulls out a win, she's pretty well screwed politically...


33 posted on 12/02/2004 12:32:58 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks ('Hate' is just a special kind of Love we give to people who suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: BlackRazor

You are correct. If the final manual recount changed the outcome of the race, then the counties and districts of the state would pick up the tab -- whether they had budgeted for it or not. If the outcome did not change, then the party requesting the recount would have to pay the entire cost.


34 posted on 12/02/2004 12:33:15 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson