Posted on 12/02/2004 3:50:22 AM PST by Born Conservative
George Banks is getting a chance to live a bit longer, thanks to a court ruling Wednesday that puts his execution, originally set for tonight, on hold.
A successful appeal to the state Supreme Court will send Banks' case back to Luzerne County Court for an evidentiary hearing to determine his mental capacity and competency, which his defense lawyers hope will spare him from ever being put to death. The high court ordered that the hearing be held "expeditiously."
"This is exactly what we were looking for," said Banks' defense lawyer Albert J. Flora Jr. "It was obviously very close but I felt all along the stay should be granted." However, Luzerne County District Attorney David Lupas isn't so happy with the latest development.
"I am certainly not surprised by today's (Wednesday's) ruling, given the history and path this case has taken over the past 22 years since the 13 killings occurred. "The defense has raised a myriad of issues and legal challenges over several decades which have worked their way through the state and federal court systems, including a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2004, which once again paved the way for Mr. Banks' execution."
Banks, 62, was scheduled to die at 7 p.m. today for the September 1982 shooting rampage that killed 13 people, including five of his children, in Wilkes-Barre and Jenkins Township.
The state Supreme Court issued the stay of execution based upon an appeal Flora and the Federal Public Defender Association of Philadelphia filed Tuesday regarding a ruling by Luzerne County President Judge Michael Conahan on Monday.
Judge Conahan denied Banks' a stay of execution, saying the killer's lawyers failed to timely file the petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act within 60 days of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on June 24. That ruling reinstated Banks' 12 death sentences that had been overturned by the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals in 2001.
"We're obviously very grateful the state Supreme Court ruled in our favor," said Michael Wiseman, supervisory assistant with the Federal Public Defender Association. Coincidentally, the state Supreme Court Tuesday rejected Banks' petition for a stay of execution that claimed he is incompetent and suffers from several mental illnesses preventing him from making rational decisions about his case.
Banks' mother, Mary Yelland, was named on the petitions as "Next Friend Petitioner" due to Banks' alleged inability to comprehend the case against him. With the ruling, the state Supreme Court ordered the evidentiary hearing to be held "expeditiously." Judge Conahan could not be See KILLER, page 20 reached for comment to determine when that hearing will be held. Flora said he would meet with Luzerne County Court officials to schedule a date.
Prior to the ruling by the state Supreme Court that was issued at about 2:30 p.m., Banks' lawyers had filed a voluminous petition for an emergency stay of execution with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. A hearing had been set for 5 p.m. before the Judge James F. McClure in Williamsport but was cancelled upon the state Supreme Court's ruling. Banks' lawyers argued executing someone who is mentally ill would violate the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment, which bans cruel and unusual punishment.
During court proceedings before Judge Conahan on Monday and in state Commonwealth Court on Tuesday, Banks' lawyers raised the 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case Ford v. Wainwright, which banned the execution of the insane and mentally retarded. Banks has not been officially declared incompetent in a court of law, which will be reviewed now in Luzerne County Court.
Former Luzerne County District Attorney Robert Gillespie said Banks was found competent during his 1983 trial. "That was the central portion of the whole trial - of Banks' competency," Gillespie said. "Even before the trial started, there was a question about his competency." Gillespie said Banks' lawyers produced two psychiatrists and prosecutors countered by presenting two psychiatrists before his criminal trial began.
"He did not meet the M'Naughten Test," Gillespie said. The M'Naughten Rule is a test applied if a defendant claims an insanity defense to determine if he or she was laboring under such a defect of reason from disease of the mind, leaving them unable to know the nature and the quality of the criminal act. Flora said Dr. Robert Sadoff, a psychiatrist who testified in 1983 that Banks was competent to stand trial, has now reversed his position.
"Although I found Mr. Banks sane at the time of the offenses, I also found that he suffered from paranoia, a major mental illness," Dr. Sadoff wrote in an affidavit filed with the Middle District Court Wednesday. Dr. Sadoff continued, "...I would strongly recommend that Mr. Banks' execution be stayed so that his mental state can be evaluated by several professionals with appropriate time in an in-patient setting in order to meaningfully resolve the issues about Mr. Banks' competency or lack thereof."
Before the state Supreme Court ruling, Gillespie said he doubted Banks' execution would ever take place. He did plan to attend, believing he owed it to the 13 victims and one survivor. "I'd be shocked that the execution takes place," Gillespie said. "I've always taken the position to have anyone on death row for that many years is more cruel and unusual punishment than the execution itself."
Susan McNaughton, representative for the state Department of Corrections, said Banks was not transferred to the State Correctional Institution at Rockview, Centre County, where executions take place. He remains at SCI-Graterford, Montgomery County. Banks' execution had been under a temporary stay issued Tuesday by Commonwealth Court Judge Bonnie Brigance Leadbetter.
If the state Supreme Court had not acted Wednesday or Thursday, Judge Leadbetter's temporary stay would have continued and the death warrant signed by Gov. Ed Rendell Oct. 5 would had expired at midnight Thursday.
|
Paris names Abu-Jamal an Honorary Citizen From Times Wire Reports The Paris city council has named Mumia Abu-Jamal, as an honorary citizen of Paris. Abu-Jamal has been on a U.S. death row in Pennnslylvania for 20 year. The African Amercian journalist was convicted of killing a police officer in a trial that has caused international controversy An article on the action of the City of Paris also appeared in Los Angeles Times on Dec.6, Home section page A23 Also see AP report below U.S. Inmate Named Honorary Parisian By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 3:35 p.m. ET PARIS (AP) -- The Paris city council has named U.S. death row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal, convicted for the 1981 slaying of a police officer, as an honorary citizen of Paris. The show of solidarity with Abu-Jamal, a former Black Panther and journalist, came in a vote Tuesday in the wake of the Nov. 21 decision by a Philadelphia court, which said it did not have jurisdiction over a request for a new trial. Jean Vuillermoz, leader of the Communist Party grouping on the council, said the decision by the council follows ``alarming news'' about Abu-Jamal. Vuillermoz said Pablo Picasso was the last person to receive the title, which is symbolic, in 1971. Abu-Jamal argued that his former lawyers did a poor job and that he has new evidence that could clear him. The death row inmate's federal appeal is pending. Celebrities, death penalty opponents and foreign politicians have rallied to Abu-Jamal's cause, calling him a political prisoner and saying he was railroaded by a racist justice system. Human rights groups have scheduled a demonstration in support of Abu-Jamal in front of the U.S. Embassy in Paris on Saturday.
International Action Center
Send your comments to webweaver@mumia2000.org |
"Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, pp. 122-123
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.