Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Still a Man's World on the Idiot Box
NY Times ^ | Dec 2, 2004 | Maureen Dowd

Posted on 12/01/2004 7:26:32 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

It's the End of an Era. A momentous change.

Tonight, on NBC, one tall and handsome white male anchor with bespoke clothes will replace another tall and handsome white male anchor with bespoke clothes.

Even Tom Brokaw is a little surprised that he has been succeeded by someone who looks like the love child he and Peter Jennings never had.

"I honestly thought, eight or nine years ago, that when we left," Mr. Brokaw said, referring to himself, Peter and Dan Rather, "that it would be the end of white male anchor time."

Nah. Those guys are hard to kill off. Indeed, white men are ascendant in Red State America.

As my mom said, discussing her belief that Martha Stewart had been railroaded by jealous men, "If men could figure out how to have babies, they'd get rid of us altogether."

The networks don't even give lip service to looking for women and blacks for anchor jobs - they just put pretty-boy clones in the pipeline.

"I think we're still stuck in a society that looks at white males as authority figures," Mr. Brokaw conceded.

Bill Carter, a TV reporter at The Times, agreed: "Katie Couric may be a much bigger star and even more experienced than Brian Williams. But when the next 9/11 happens, it'll be Brian, not Katie, in the central role. The attitude still seems to be, 'We want a daddy in that chair.' "

And then there's biology. Asked why there couldn't be an anchorette as we enter 2005, Mr. Brokaw, the father of three accomplished daughters and the husband of one strong, cool wife, Meredith, replied: "You know, honestly, what happens is career interruptus by childbirth and a couple of other things. It's unfair to women that they have to juggle all this stuff, but it plays some role, I think."

At CBS, the Dan Rather look-alike John Roberts is locked in a battle with the Dan Rather sound-alike Scott Pelley to succeed Dan, and executives are considering four guys - three of them white - to replace Craig Kilborn on "The Late Late Show."

At NBC, Conan O'Brien is locked in to succeed Jay Leno in 2009, and executives have groomed Brian Williams for a decade to replace Tom Brokaw. I asked Brian in December 1995 if he was a Tom pod person. "I can deny the existence of a factory in the American Midwest that puts out people like me," he said, deadpan, looking at me with those green anchor eyes.

Roger Ailes says he has joked about Mr. Williams having too many shirts, but says he'll "do better than people think. ... He has that Tom Brokaw look of somebody every mother wants her daughter to marry."

Even if I felt like raising a ruckus about Boys Nation, who would care? Feminism lasted for a nanosecond, but the backlash has lasted 30 years.

We are in the era of vamping, self-doubting "Desperate Housewives," not strong, cutting "Murphy Brown." It's the season of prim "stay in the background" Laura Bush, not assertive "two for the price of one" Hillary. Where would you even lodge a feminist protest these days?

"You ought to call the Lifetime network or, as we say, the 'Men Are No Damn Good Network,' and protest it," Mr. Ailes slyly suggested.

I know that women have surpassed men, in many respects, by embracing their femininity and frivolity. Katie Couric and Diane Sawyer, who mix news with dish, cooking and fashion in the morning, are the real breadwinners of their news divisions, generating more ratings and revenue than the cookie-cutter men of the night.

Yet, as Mr. Ailes says, "network anchoring is still Mount Olympus." I checked around for feminist outrage, but couldn't find any. Women told me the nightly news was an anachronism, so why shouldn't the anchor be? "Caring about having a woman in the showcase or figurehead role seems so 80's," one said.

Another friend said she devotes the "one little ounce of feminist annoyance" she has left for the excess of "young fluffs" on cable news, as opposed to substantial newswomen, like CNN's bespectacled Pentagon reporter, Barbara Starr, "who looks like she could hit those generals with a handbag if they didn't give her answers."

But my pal admits that she watched Mr. Brokaw partly because he was "eye candy," and declares women at fault in this matter: "Women like to read books about men and go to movies about men. But men don't like to read books about women or go to movies about women. The only way this is going to change is if women refuse to watch men. And the problem is, women like watching men."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: anchors; dowd; maureendowd; zetajones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Nah. Those guys are hard to kill off. Indeed, white men are ascendant in Red State America.

Uh, since when did NBC give a damn about what "red state" people want?

Maureen, try using your brain for once.

Liberals run NBC. Liberals are supposedly for the advancement of women and all races. NBC chose a white male. Not "red state" America.

Meanwhile, G.W. just replaced a black male (Powell) with a black woman (Condi) and hired two hispanics to replace two white men. These advancements made by the so called repressive and intolerant GOP President elected by "red state" voters. Does he receive credit from you for these actions? Nope. You continue to choose to live in your liberal fantasyland.

Unlike you, Maureen, I don't care what color or sex a person may be. I'm a white female and find Katie to be completely unqualified. I may have selected someone other than Williams, but do believe he is far more qualified based on his intelligence and experience. I don't hold a prejudice toward white males, toward conservative black women chosen to be SOS or a Supreme Court justice, nor towards conservative Hispanic's chosen to serve as AG or commerce secretary.

Try looking beyond race or gender.

21 posted on 12/01/2004 7:48:51 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

22 posted on 12/01/2004 7:48:51 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It's the season of prim "stay in the background" Laura Bush, not assertive "two for the price of one" Hillary.

well, for one thing, we don't elect a 'two for one" president - We elect a president to fulfill the role of president - Do the spouses of CEO's think they have a say in how the companies their spouse runs?

But seriously, ms dowdy, feminism lost credibility every time they sat silent if the woman being raked over the coals was republican and when the louse was a male democrat.

in other words, they outed themselves - or to put it another way, emasculated themselves ;o)

(and before someone calls me nasty woman-hater - I'm a mother of 5, grandmother of 15. So I like woman - and I like men - I like PEOPLE, whoever, whatever they are, for their individual qualities...which means I don't like ms dowdy)

23 posted on 12/01/2004 7:49:34 PM PST by maine-iac7 ( Pray without doubt..."Ask and you SHALL receive")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Until your post, I'd rarely seen such flagrant disregard for The Rules.


24 posted on 12/01/2004 7:51:16 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Nah. Those guys are hard to kill off. Indeed, white men are ascendant in Red State America.

That's your blue state networks Dowdy.

Besides. I prefer Fox News...where babes reign.

25 posted on 12/01/2004 7:51:53 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("now we got this guy in the Oval office who don't take no sh*t from no gimpy little countries!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Good one!


26 posted on 12/01/2004 7:52:23 PM PST by aroostook war
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dighton; MisterRepublican
Until your post, I'd rarely seen such flagrant disregard for The Rules.

Shocking, isn't it?
To be fair, MisterRepublican attempted to post a CZJ photo up-thread.

Close, but no cigar: Tripod doesn't allow hotlinking.

27 posted on 12/01/2004 7:54:15 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Y'know, after reading another long kvetch from MoDo, that was just what I needed to put me back in a good mood.

I think I understand Michael Douglas.

28 posted on 12/01/2004 7:55:09 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Pathetic.


29 posted on 12/01/2004 8:00:28 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (You can drive from coast to coast and never pass through a single county won by Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Dowd's premise is simply wrong.

In past years, the major networks (ABC,CBS,NBC) have attempted to use widely heralded female anchors on the evening news programs - e.g. Barbara Walter (ABC)and Connie Chung (CBS)-and the result was that IT DIDN'T WORK. The ratings numbers simply weren't there, and the networks were forced to go back to male anchors. This past history is quite obviously unknown to Ms. Dowd (this would take some research beyond that provided by her lunches with other Times' staffers).

The answer here is not about keeping women like Katie Couric out of the anchor chair. It's about the business of television which, in the end, is about generating ratings to attract advertising dollars. Ms. Dowd should not critique an industry marketing decision when she doesn't know the industry and the way it works.
30 posted on 12/01/2004 8:04:08 PM PST by tvn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OwnershipSociety

I know I'm convinced. Virtually, every sitcom for the past how many decades has an idiot for the man/father/husband/foil. The woman/wife/mother/resident female, inevitably mocks/slices and dices/humiliates/sets up her male target. The men are, for the most part, not handsome but fat and portrayed as stupid with IQs equal to their belt size. However, let's completely ignore that staple and whine about the lack of female anchors.


31 posted on 12/01/2004 8:17:36 PM PST by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

This is very interesting that Mo has interviewed Roger Ailes for this column. She obviously admires his fair and balanced point of view.


32 posted on 12/01/2004 8:28:11 PM PST by nana4bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

My first thought is that maybe Mo would not be averse to having one of the major networks invite her to anchor their news programs. Her being so good looking and all.


33 posted on 12/01/2004 8:38:24 PM PST by Cicero (Nil illegitemus carborundum est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
I may have selected someone other than Williams, but do believe he is far more qualified based on his intelligence and experience.

He listens to Rush, has for years. It's a start.

34 posted on 12/01/2004 8:41:38 PM PST by Mister Baredog ((DO IT NOW, if you haven't put up a flag on your FR homepage yet,PLEASE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
I may have selected someone other than Williams, but do believe he is far more qualified based on his intelligence and experience.

He listens to Rush, has for years. It's a start.

He also learned from Brit Hume, heard him talking about it today on Hannity's radio show.

35 posted on 12/01/2004 8:42:59 PM PST by Mister Baredog ((DO IT NOW, if you haven't put up a flag on your FR homepage yet,PLEASE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection


36 posted on 12/02/2004 1:42:58 AM PST by Imaverygooddriver (I`m a very good driver and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Katie Couric may be a much bigger star and even more experienced than Brian Williams...."

I guess being a liberal propagandist passes as experience now. Oh wait, excuse me, it`s all about being a "star". Yes she does have that 1000 watt smile.


37 posted on 12/02/2004 1:54:52 AM PST by Imaverygooddriver (I`m a very good driver and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Whine, snivel, play the victim. Engender even more hatred towards white men.


38 posted on 12/02/2004 3:16:20 AM PST by tkathy (There will be no world peace until all thuggocracies are gone from the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I got two alliterative words for Ms. Dowd.

The first word is "condescending ... ".
39 posted on 12/02/2004 3:23:49 AM PST by Beckwith (John Kerry is now a kept man . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Maureen, you ignorant slut, you hardly set an example for your gender that networks concerned about ratings and profitability would want to splash around the airwaves. You are the 'dead raccoon' of print journalism who could exist only at the Times.

40 posted on 12/02/2004 6:03:32 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson