Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tom h

"I don't recall a lot about these votes but they were not directly for Kennedy or any other candidate, but the media have always placed them in the Kennedy national vote total so as to give Kennedy more votes nationally than Nixon."



That was only in Alabama, where several of the Democrat electors were "free Democrats" (or some such term) who had not pledged to vote for Kennedy and went on to vote for Sen. Harry Byrd. In Mississippi and Louisiana, the there were three main slates of electors: Republicans, Democrats and "Unpledged Democratic Electors." People who voted for the Unpledged Electors have their votes recorded as such on every source I have seen, and in fact the Unpledged slate in Mississippi received more votes than either the Kennedy or Nixon slates and thus the Unpledged slate was elected as the electors from MS (they, too, voted for Byrd).

It is uncertain whether Nixon would have received more votes than Kennedy nationwide had Alabama listed a slate of "Unpledged Democratic Electors" like MS and LA did. However, had that happended, Nixon would have probably carried Alabama, although it wouldn't be enough to keep Kennedy below the required 269 electoral votes (back then) for victory.


114 posted on 12/02/2004 1:42:50 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican

In 1968, Wallace had his slate of electors on the Democrtic line in Alabama and made Humphrey's electors run on some other line.


130 posted on 12/04/2004 10:26:25 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson