Since when did George Bush have a "dry image"?
I don't know, maybe he has that image with the Canadians? He sure doesn't have that rep with Americans
If Bush is "dry," than people like Gore and Kerry must be "super-dry."
Since when did George Bush have a "dry image"?
That was my thought exactly when I first saw this headline. Bush has always, ALWAYS been very witty and funny and certainly not "dry."
Also, the line about how his "speech writers" might be funny was, of course, a little jab to say that Bush himself cannot really be witty (when, of course, if you read the article you see that a lot of the humor was Bush's adlibs during the press conference).
The headline is the equivalent of saying "Bill Clinton Shakes His Puritanical Nature And Talks About Sex"
That's what I was wondering! LOL
I know Paul Martin is liberal, but I can see he genuinely likes President Bush. When Martin was first elected and traveled to D.C. I remember he said at their joint press conference that he admired the way President Bush handled the press (another non-dry GWB outing).
He doesn't.
This is why the Canadiens were surprised by his quick wit. They have the same lying media as we do, All Propaganda, All The Time.
My thoughts exactly...
George has always had a great sense of humor.
He has never had a "dry" image.
He doesn't.
It just helped make a story out of how colorful and witty he was.
Since when did 'W' have a "dry image"?
Why ever since what used to be known as the Mainstream Media defined him as a humorless, dull, inarticulate, brainless, robotic cowboy idiot.
Their image. The former mainstream media. You do remember them, don't you?