Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Wait a minute. If what they are saying is true, how can I know if this article is even true?
1 posted on 11/30/2004 8:54:06 PM PST by freakboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: freakboy

Yeah, did the Pentagon feed this article to the LA TIMES?


2 posted on 11/30/2004 8:55:42 PM PST by msnimje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freakboy

Are you saying we can't trust the MSM?


4 posted on 11/30/2004 9:00:02 PM PST by Drango (Those who advocate robbing (taxing) Peter to pay Paul...will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freakboy

LOL! This article should have been titled "HELP! The guns have been turned on us"


5 posted on 11/30/2004 9:01:07 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freakboy

OMG, I'm outta tin foil!!!!


7 posted on 11/30/2004 9:05:42 PM PST by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freakboy
What the article doesn't say is the most telling part of this exercise.

This dis-information; combined with some drone carried ordinance gave our intel some of the exit routes that would be taken by the insurgents in time of attack.

It started a spy vs spy type of operation, in which we broadcast video of their movement into the region, showing we could track them in an attempt to demoralize.

They responded by placing covers over alley ways to prevent video imaging, and we countered by sending them infrared imaging of heat signatures showing them moving through the covered alleys.

In many respects, the entire operation was "wargamed" from the time of this false release of operation and the actual operation.

I don't remember the source for this, but it was spelled out in detail and this is as much as I could recall.
8 posted on 11/30/2004 9:06:42 PM PST by Dalite (If PRO is the opposite of CON, What is the opposite of PROgress? Go Figure....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freakboy
"As the story developed, we quickly made it clear to our viewers exactly what was going on in and around Fallujah," CNN spokesman Matthew Furman said.
"Wow, we almost saved American lives and helped defeat the enemy. That was close!"

The study cited polling in the Arab world that revealed widespread hatred of the United States throughout the Middle East. A poll taken in June by Zogby International revealed that 94 percent of Saudi Arabians have an "unfavorable" view of the United States, compared with 87 percent in April 2002. In Egypt, the second largest recipient of U.S. aid, 98 percent of respondents held an unfavorable view of the United States.

Oh, so they hate us? Why didn't someone tell me? Guess what, I have an "unfavorable" view of s.a., egypt and islam generally. Cut off the allowance until these violent adolescents treat US with respect and understand our "feelings".
12 posted on 11/30/2004 9:58:39 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freakboy
"As the story developed, we quickly made it clear to our viewers exactly what was going on in and around Fallujah," CNN spokesman Matthew Furman said.

If this is true, isn't CNN giving direct aid to the enemy?

Not too different from how the Germans used French newspapers to get damage assessments and accuracy reports on the Paris guns in World War I.

I don't like the idea that American news channels are giving real-time intelligence updates to the enemy!

Mark

13 posted on 11/30/2004 9:59:51 PM PST by MarkL (Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson