Replies

Thank you. I don't need a lecture from you or from her, don't consider my previous comments to be "lashing out" and have "lashed out" plenty at the enemy in the past 24 years.

I also think people with her "style" (the non-compromising schtick is nothing new) have done more harm than good for the pro-life movement and I am tired of seeing the same mistakes being repeated over and over.

There is no doubt that the pro-choice goons will try their darnedest to paint this debate as all or nothing, either ALL abortion is banned or none is. The lies and mischaracterizations will flow hot and heavy from the societal engineering serial killing defenders so it will be incumbent upon we of the pro-life side to show the middle ground. I believe the notion of self defense is just the sort of middle ground that allows us to meet many choicers at some point other than the extremes, yet we will not be compromising where the aliveness of the unborn is at stake. What say you, toughy?

Thank you. I don't need a lecture from you or from her

You're willing to lecture her about her stance. Why dish out what you're unwilling to take?

I also think people with her "style" (the non-compromising schtick is nothing new)

It's compromise that's made the pro-life movement fail. The appoinments of the Ginsbergs and the O'Connors. Liberals have tried appeasement time and time again. They wanted to appease the nazis and they wanted to appease the commies and we saw the results of appeasement.

We learned that you don't give Czechleslovakia to the Nazis in exchange for "peace in our time." And having learned that lesson, I'm unwilling to give liberals just a few dead babies in exchange for peace between parties.

You're not for compromise any more than she is. You're attacking her way of doing things and you want her to change. Well, that's not compromise. That's insisting on having things your way and your way, as I see it, is wrong.