Read the text from this recent text book used today in public schools and draw your own conclusions. I found this in Lee Stroble's "Case for a Creator."
Futuyma Douglas author of "Evolutionary Biology"--page 3--"By coupling undirected, purposeless variation to the blind, uncaring process of natural selection, Darwin made theological or spiritual explanations of the life processes superflous."
As Strategerist has pointed out, that's a false statement. I see nothing in post 65 that acknowledges it's a false statement. Would you like to acknowledge it?
It is not a false statement, what are you talking about?
That particular book is used in some college classes--and it says what I said it says.
As far as post 65, I show you clearly that highschool texts use the same language.