No need. I'm very much aware of it. And quite contented with it.
My only reason for engaging you was over the statement you made about the Constitution's having scriptural roots (back in post 481 you said: "In fact, the bible was a major contributor to the development of our constitution."). If we're straight on that point -- and I truly hope we are -- then that's all I wanted to accomplish; and our dialogue is done.
Good, because I really wasn't thrilled about the extra homework.