Well, the bottom one is a fairly early reptile. It has a multipart lower jaw bone. Its teeth show almost no differentiation. (No molars, incisors, etc.) The top end of the series has two early mammals. The multipart jaw bones before your eyes have become a single jaw bone and three ear bones. The teeth have become the familiar mammalian pattern. That you think that doesn't mean anything probably means you should stay out of science class unless you want to enroll as a student.
Obviously you have strongly held beliefs, a person of conviction. There is nothing wrong with that.
No, I am reasoning from a sizeable preponderance of evidence. There's nothing wrong with that. That's the way to do most things.
I too have strongly held beliefs and am a person of conviction.
There can be something wrong with that. In particular, you are absolutely evidence-proof.
There will be no proof of macro-evolution found as there is none.
You seem to be willing to define away any such you are presented. It is unreasonable to demand evidence which you will always throw out on any possible excuse or no excuse.
Many scientists admit to this flaw and are trying to figure out ways to get around it.
The evidence I have presented to you is accepted by science. They see it. YOU are trying to get round it.
It is becoming so well known that Darwin's theory is very flawed that we are now seeing a push to include alternative theories.
That push is coming from creationists who want to get creationism into the schools despite various separation clause rulings.
Intelligent design is one and it has a lot of backing in the science field.
It doesn't have a shred of scientific backing or standing.
Look, I'm not into arguing back and forth. We won't reach a compromise. There is no preponderance of evidence, despite what you say. I'm not trying to get around anything but I researched how "evidence" is manipulated by evolutionists to prove their case. It is now starting to fall apart on them. If you don't see it, then that is to your detriment.
And, no where in the constitution does it state separation of church and state. This is the biggest misunderstanding today. I believe it was in a document written by Jefferson? that said that no government will force a religion on its people as the Anglican church was forced on our forefathers (believe or die. That's the crux of the separation of church and state.
Believe it or not, some atheists believe in intelligent design, unfortunately the designer is an alien.