Geez, you are easily persuaded. If what you see in your pictures tells you our grandpa's are apes, that's what you see. I see a bunch of fossils of skulls lined up in an attempt to prove an unproven theory. I would imagine that many of those animals lived at the same time, so how would that be explained?
Evidence will do that for people who go by that kind of thing.
If what you see in your pictures tells you our grandpa's are apes, that's what you see.
I see that there is no possible fossil evidence that would matter to you. So what would have been the big deal about you just admitting that up front?
I see a bunch of fossils of skulls lined up in an attempt to prove an unproven theory.
Try to remember that they weren't supposed to exist. In 1859, they had not been found at all. In our time, they've been found but for you they still don't exist.
I would imagine that many of those animals lived at the same time, so how would that be explained?
There are still non-hominid apes now. There are still reptiles now. Why do you imagine this as a problem? It's a branching process in which at any given time, many various life forms are around. (Just not so many very early on.)
Recall that originally the figure didn't show anything macro going on anyway. There is no evidence for macroevolution, you said. Now you seem to be just sort of thrashing around.