Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro

It's not any of those. Nothing macro about those changes to me. Maybe if the skull changes into a mouse, I'd see macro.


422 posted on 12/01/2004 12:23:29 PM PST by Right in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies ]


To: Right in Wisconsin
Maybe if the skull changes into a mouse, I'd see macro.

That's not the way evolution works, but even if such a transistional series was shown to you, wouldn't you just say the skulls are just humans, apes and mice?

426 posted on 12/01/2004 12:32:02 PM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

To: Right in Wisconsin
So a man and a chimp are the same biblical kind? Could Adam have been a chimp?
435 posted on 12/01/2004 12:53:07 PM PST by VadeRetro (Nothing means anything when you go to Hell for knowing what things mean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

To: Right in Wisconsin
Are a man and a lemur the same kind?

The hominid series seems undramatic to you. But if anyone made a similar display for primitive primates to monkeys to early apes, it would be similarly undramatic.

Same thing for the record from early placental insectivores to primates. Here's another series, farther back down the tree. How dramatic does this look?



438 posted on 12/01/2004 1:01:17 PM PST by VadeRetro (Nothing means anything when you go to Hell for knowing what things mean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson