Someone has been watching too much science fiction.
HAZARDOUS SURMISING: "The fossil record pertaining to man is still so sparsely known that those who insist on positive declarations can do nothing more than jump from one hazardous surmise to another and hope that the next dramatic discovery does not make them utter fools ... Clearly some refuse to learn from this. As we have seen, there are numerous scientists and popularizers today who have the temerity to tell us that there is 'no doubt' how man originated: if only they had the evidence..."
(William R Fix, The Bone Pedlars, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1984, p.150)
Also see:
FRAUD: Neanderthal Man 'Never Walked In Northern Europe'
Historians of the Stone Age fear that they will have to rip up their theories about Neanderthal Man after doubt has been cast on the carbon dating of skeletons by a leading German anthropologist.
Also see:
Homo floresiensis and the Facts Emerging about the Evolution Myth
The game played by evolutionists by interpreting variations in ancient bones according to their own preconceptions consists of window-dressing scenarios of human evolution in any way they choose. It needs to be realized that telling fairy tales based on the similarity of bones is a pointless activity in the face of the true facts.
So your answer to "Are any of these macro-E fossils?" would be "No."
Where did you answer, "If it isn't, what would a thing have to be to qualify as this thing [a "macro-E fossil"] reasonably to be expected in the fossil record but supposedly not there?"
And Harun Yahya? Why don't you just join the Taliban and get it over with?