This was a reply to you, not me, I messed up the first time:
Yeah, I have no understanding of evolution--even though alot of my studies are on that very subject.
I would like to mention that many of the top scientists today disagree with evolution and also many of them believe in God.
A few examples of these scientists are:
1.Henry F. Schaefer--3rd most cited chemist in the world.
2. James Tour--Rice University Center for Nanoscale Sience and Technology
3. Fred Figwoth--professor of cellular and molecular biology at Yale Graduate School.
How about the director of the Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry and scientists at the Plasma Physics Lab at Princeton. How about the director of the director of the National Museum of Natural History, how the hundreds of other acredited scientists who disagree with the theory of macro-evolution? Are they all stupid hicks too?
"A few examples of these scientists are:
1.Henry F. Schaefer--3rd most cited chemist in the world.
2. James Tour--Rice University Center for Nanoscale Sience and Technology
3. Fred Figwoth--professor of cellular and molecular biology at Yale Graduate School. "
And they deny it for religious, not scientific, reasons.
Meanwhile, the remaining 99.995% of the scientific community accepts the conclusion that evolution best explains what we observe.
You lost this fight 150 years ago. Give it up.