No, what I meant in my statement is that several of the members (who I know are conservative or libertarian) are debating like a liberal does. They keep moving the goal posts on me. If you want to disagree or debate my general thesis (that liberals are attempting to take God out of the schools and one way they are doing it is by using Darwinsim) that is fine. Debate me on that stance. but what I don't like is people questioning my research. Saying that my quotes were either "fake" or that they "did not come from any US high-school text book in the country."
I find it hard to believe that members of the FR do not see this fact. Heck, we just had a teacher say that students can't read the Declartion of ID because it mentions God!
This is my thesis. I am not debating whether or not evolution is true or whether or not Charles Darwin was a fine upstanding citizen. I am simply making a point about the attempt--by liberals--to rid God from our nation.
Did you really research them yourself from texts you knew to be high-school texts, or did you merely take them from other people's web pages? They all seem to be things other people have quoted extensively. I doubt you were deliberately false; I think you merely accepted other people's false attributions without checking. You should be careful about that.