not at all. there is no subtle reference intended -- apes were created, named, and continue to be apes today. there is more proof for that than there is for "transitional forms". i personally think creation science/intelligent design is much more exciting and fascinating than evolution. i have heard some amazing descriptions of the flood and its impact on the earth and heavens, that make perfect sense based on the observable. we are even seeing some evidence of how it could have happened today.
Funny that the Chinese, American Indicans, Incans, Aztecs, Egyptions ... never saw the big flood.
Can you tell us how "Creation Science" explains why the backbone, the common structure among all vertebrates such as fish, reptiles and mammals, appears as one of the earliest structures laid out in all vertebrate embryos, while the the cerebrum in humans, the most sophisticated part of the brain, develops last?