Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
I can see two scenarios where Hillary would win--a weak Republican nominee, or a strong third-party candidate drawing more votes from the Republicans than from the Democrats (like Perot did).

I'd like to think she'd be a sure loser, but four years is a long time to look ahead in politics (who in 1972 thought that the 1976 race would be between Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter?). About 2007 if it looks like Hillary can't be stopped from getting the nomination but is likely to lose the election we might see a lot of panic on the Democrat side...they would be looking at another 4 or 8 years in the wilderness.

79 posted on 11/30/2004 11:06:02 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus
or a strong third-party candidate

Bingo! Start watching for a suspiciously funded right-leaning third-party candidate. There's her winning strategy, both siphoning off opposition votes and creating a distraction.

81 posted on 11/30/2004 1:11:01 PM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson