Expert: Massive WMD attack 'inevitable'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, November 30, 2004

[ASA Vet]

I think there needs to be camps set up right now and the Islamic hoards processed out of this country.

40% of American mooselimbs are blacks who are natural born US Citizens.
Where are you going to send them?

[auggy]

"I think there needs to be camps set up right now and the Islamic hoards processed out of this country."

I do too. If, we are fighting a premptive war, this should be done , before WMD's are used.

[jusduat]

Therapy for the native born muslims.....the arabs don't
think they are real muslims anyway. Someone told me
that black and slave are the same word in arab.

[CaptSkip]

I think there needs to be camps set up right now and the Islamic hoards processed out of this country.

If you are interested, there's LOTS of discussion [tinfoil/conspiracy/EOTWAWKI] about the semi secret internment camps being maintained and under the control of FEMA for "rounding-up the usual suspects" in large quantities when the SHTF. Whatever the particular S*** that impacts our national fan might be.

[ChildofReagan]

Round them up, if they're with the enemy.

[ChildofReagan]

Not into conspiracies, just winning the war.

If it worked for FDR, then why not now.

[CaptSkip]

If the photos of the FEMA Camps are true, they may in fact exist though only whispered about, if that, because of PC sensitivities, and people not wanting to discuss cessation of Civil Rights under Martial Law.

[BureaucratusMaximus]

I don't know about this. The time to launch a WMD attack would have been 3 years ago, not today. I'd say the chances for a successful WMD attack on US soil by Islamic terrorists fared a higher probability pre-9/11. And with each day that passes by (assuming we keep up our military, economic, and diplomatic pressure), the chances grow slimmer still.

Well...we all thought Osama bin Laden was dead too. The author is partially correct...a WND attack on U.S. soil is inevitable.

[Old Professer]

The release of reports such as this is itself is a form of terrorism, whose side are these people on, anyway?

[ctdonath2]

To a terrorist, detonating a nuke IS the message, and the time is NOW (whenever "now" is). It would be a defining event, not depending on any other event, message, location, time, warning, or other consideration for leverage.

The 9/11 attacks did not depend, hinge, or leverage off any other fact, incident, preparation, threat, history, relationship, etc. aside from target location. It, in and of itself, was a defining moment. A nuke detonating would likewise be such, a hundredfold - and would not need to involve a particular landmark as WTC was.

The only conceivable relevant planning point is getting it to a major city - any part thereof.

If AQ had a nuke and could move it to a world-recognized city, we would be discussing the past-tense event right now, not the possibility.

[maestro]

Islam is itself a WMD.........?

[auggy]

I would agree with the therapy for the newborns, but I am sure they will be going with their parents when they leave our Great Country.

[BritishBulldog]

As I see it, if these psychos had and could deploy WMD they'd have used them already.

That's not to say they won't get them.

Incidentally,

"They got the KOSHA stamp from the ISLAMIC world to use nuclear weapons,"

LOL, good un that!

[World'sGoneInsane]

The release of reports such as this is itself is a form of terrorism, whose side are these people on, anyway?

That's why they release tapes every month or so. Even if it were true, what more could we possibly do? Statistically, I wonder the possibility of dying in a dirty bomb attack, compares to one dying in a car accident, being a murder victim, or just dropping dead tomorrow. If nothing else, the reports serve to psychologically prepare people for the worst. IMHO, if this were from a reliable source, even France would be on our side.

[KingNo155]

Islam is the only thing that will suffer if there is another attack. Bin Laden and Sept 11th opened up hatred in lots of peoples hearts, that hatred is subsiding. Another attack will bring it out full force and it might never subside.

[Common Tator]

They can't be that stupid. Were they to use a nuke on the United States we would nuke every Muslim nation. There would be few if any Muslims left alive in the world.

It would be Pearl Harbor times 50. Back then we carpet bombed Tokyo with incendiary bombs that literally killed millions of ordinary Japanese citizens. We would kill billions of Muslims.

The can't be that stupid.

[ChildofReagan]

Target Package: Pyongyang, N. Korea; Damacus, Syria; Tehran, Iran; Mecca; Medina; Yemen; Sudan.

One nuclear sub and its payload would take care of this from the Red Sea.

[JustDoItAlways]

The reason we went into Iraq is to prevent such WMD attacks in the US in the future.

We have put a big dent in al-qaeda's ability to carry out such attacks, now and in the future, but it is still the biggest risk faced for the American people.

9/11 demonstrated that these people (nut-jobs) don't care how many innocent people they kill so the risk will always be there as long as these people are walking around on the face on the earth.

The risk only gets larger as science and technology grows and access to it expands (which is it doing an ever increasing pace.)

That's why the solutions must be two-fold,

- limit or eliminate their access to WMD; and,
- kill and/or jail as many of these nut-jobs as we can before they can do something.

[PatriotGirl827]

Bush already said a couple of years ago that we would respond with nuclear weapons, if necessary.

[Fruitbat]

Major portions of the hardline fighters are being lured into Iraq and killed by the thousands. There are fewer and fewer who want to don the suicide vests.

Great point! I dare say that if there truly were 500-750,000 of them, then a "handful" more would be in Iraq taking it up with our troops, not subjecting their entire "home base" to freedom and rule of the people.