As to the anti-semitic stuff, be careful of what you read from British sources.
Ukrainians are going through a period of resurgent nationalism and "Ukraine for Ukrainians" is not to be wondered at.
They are not interested in being under the influence of the Russians who they consider uncultured and corrupt thieves.
regards,
Which Ukrainians do you speak for? The 50% who supported Yanukovich or the 50% who supported Yushenko? You can hardly speak for Ukrainians as a whole with that split. Just like you can hardly speak of Americans backing Bush's policies as a whole when we all know that 46% of our population dispises him, as wrong as they may be in that they still do. That's the problem with the MSM generalizations. Why does no one believe the MSM when it talks about US affairs but worship at their feet when the same lieing socialists speak of other nations?
You believe this MSM that tells you daily that Iraq is lost, the PLO are innocents, Israelies are evil, Iran is A OK, China is our buddy, the EU is a bunch of social and friendly guys.
dude are u really that close minded? I used ukranian & british sources... Why is it so unplausable for those events to have taken place? His party is after all the nationalist one UNSO stands for united nationalist socialist o.. something , they are nazis basicly.
I agree they are both the worst.
As to the anti-semitic stuff, be careful of what you read from British sources.
Should I wait for Dan Rather and the New York Times to cover this?
Ukrainians are going through a period of resurgent nationalism and "Ukraine for Ukrainians" is not to be wondered at.
Do you really think anything you didn't see with your own eyes...is not to be wondered at?