Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Twisting The Light Away [Twisted Light]
New Scientist | June 12, 2004 | Stephen Battersby

Posted on 11/29/2004 4:39:07 PM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: LibWhacker
Fire a beam of its laser light at the dust sitting on your tabletop and the dust motes will begin to dance around in circles. Fair enough, that's not quite a killer application.

Spoken by someone who's never seen the dust on my desk.

41 posted on 11/30/2004 6:10:09 AM PST by LTCJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobS

Their modulation appears to be a variation of omega. They mention there is no discriminating reciever and I know of none that would distinguish this from FM(that includes AM and PM, since they really are FM). This is too, because they are varing omega. As you probably know, all detectors are sensitive to polarizaiton, but that sensitivity is dull. I don't think they have anything here.


42 posted on 11/30/2004 6:09:42 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
Circular polarization.

Nope, it's an interference effect.

43 posted on 11/30/2004 6:24:28 PM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Might work -- but the right signal might be more sophisticated yet. The path...

Martin Harwit, emeritus professor in astronomy at Cornell University in New York, has suggested we start looking for twisted light from space as part of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.

44 posted on 11/30/2004 8:49:31 PM PST by GOPJ (M.Dowd...hits..like a bucket of vomit with Body Shop potpourri sprinked across the surface--Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

45 posted on 11/30/2004 8:51:45 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
"I thought that was an odd example of a way to send binary code -- how would you send two "offs" in a row?"

You could do it by tying the signals to a clock speed. For example the reciever expects a signal every second (or every microsecond, whatever) and if two seconds pass without a flash of light, that's two 'offs'.

46 posted on 12/03/2004 2:52:25 PM PST by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Hah. From analog to digital and back to analog again, with moxie.

47 posted on 12/03/2004 3:20:43 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tjg

"I thought that was an odd example of a way to send binary code -- how would you send two "offs" in a row?"

You could do it by tying the signals to a clock speed. For example the reciever expects a signal every second (or every microsecond, whatever) and if two seconds pass without a flash of light, that's two 'offs'.

That is certainly correct, but the example given didn't include a clock. It states:

Many forms of communication use binary codes - if you have a flashlight, and you need to send a message to your friend, you only have the choice between flashlight on and flashlight off. There's just one bit of information per flash.

"Sending a message to a friend" with a flashlight implies a "lost in the woods" scenario. It would be done with morse code, not ASCII (binary).

Picky, I know.

:)


48 posted on 12/03/2004 6:49:42 PM PST by forsnax5 (The greatest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Swordmaker; vannrox

blast from the past


49 posted on 11/11/2005 11:17:42 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Wednesday, November 2, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Sorry LibWhacker, forgot to remove your name from the "to" box.


50 posted on 11/11/2005 11:18:13 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Wednesday, November 2, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
I thought that was an odd example of a way to send binary code -- how would you send two "offs" in a row?

That would be the "nary" in binary. ;-)

51 posted on 11/11/2005 11:30:08 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: longshadow

I was asking myself the same question.


52 posted on 11/11/2005 11:36:12 PM PST by Redcloak (We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singin' "whiskey for my men and beer for my horses!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

No problemo; I like to see any new comments my old threads dredge up! :-)


53 posted on 11/12/2005 1:56:08 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson